Being a ‘Net Winner’ in a Ponzi Scheme Doesn’t Automatically Mean Nondischargeability
Alleging that a debtor realized an ‘impossibly high’ rate of return in a Ponzi scheme isn’t enough to state a claim of nondischargeability for ‘actual fraud.’
Lack of Financial Distress Doesn’t Divest a Court of Subject Matter Jurisdiction
Two North Carolina Courts have held within two months that the Bankruptcy Clause doesn’t demand ‘financial distress’ to establish subject matter jurisdiction.
With Reservations, a Chapter 11 Debtor with No Financial Distress Avoids Dismissal
Bankruptcy Judge Whitley says that a no-opt-out plan for a solvent debtor might violate creditors’ due process and jury trial rights.
Scheduling a Home with a Low Value Didn’t Protect a ‘13’ Debtor When It Was Sold
In the Fourth Circuit, creditors are compensated when there is a ‘substantial improvement’ in a chapter 13 debtor’s financial condition.
Another Court Won’t Permit a Structured Sale to Eradicate a Homestead Exemption
Subordinated lenders can’t take a ‘haircut,’ give a ‘tip’ to the trustee, sell a home and eradicate the debtor’s homestead exemption.
A Section 542(b) Turnover Action Can’t Be Used to Compel Payment of a Judgment
Writs of execution and supplemental proceedings, not turnover actions, are the methods for enforcing a money judgment, Bankruptcy Judge Warren says.
Judge McAffee Agrees with Former Judge Sontchi on Authorized Corporate Actions
The automatic stay does not bar increasing authorized shares when the debtor is a minority shareholder.
The PBGC Isn’t a ‘Triggering Creditor’ for a Section 544(b) Suit by a Trustee
If the government isn’t suing on a claim originally owing to the U.S., a trustee can’t use the six-year statute of limitations in the FDCPA.
Johnson & Johnson Venue Transferred from North Carolina to New Jersey
Deciding to transfer venue, a North Carolina bankruptcy judge said that the debtor underwent a corporate restructuring ‘purely for the purpose of filing bankruptcy.’
NC Appellate Court Rules Plans Must Be Unambiguous to Hold a Creditor in Civil Contempt, Citing Taggart
After Taggart v. Lorenzen, plans, orders and injunctions must be highly specific to hold an offending creditor in contempt.