This panel explores how good faith and bad faith are used in the Code and when it matters, how “developed” these notions are in the case law, and balancing the debtor’s right to dismiss when facing a motion to convert for cause under § 1307 for bad faith. The panelists consider Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Massachusetts and Law v. Siegel, the effect on property of the estate in a converted case under § 348 when converted in “in bad faith,” when a plan is not considered proposed in good faith under § 325, § 707(b)(3) dismissals when there is no presumption of abuse, avoiding a dismissal under § 521 related to document production, and filing a “repeat” debtor in a 7 when a 13 was filed less than six years prior under the “70% claims paid/plan proposed in good faith” exception.