Business Reorganization Committee

Committees

Post date: Tuesday, April 04, 2006

 Ten years ago, this writer, with Judge John Pearson and Tim Nohr, delved into the fantasyland of the cramdown interest rate.

Post date: Friday, September 09, 2005
Photo of Robert J. Keach
Robert J. Keach

Long-standing precedent in the First Circuit had held that claims arising out of stock redemptions, including notes payable to the former shareholders as the consi

Post date: Friday, September 09, 2005

While much of the attention on the business side of BAPCPA has been focused on the demise of KERPS, the capping of exclusivity and limitations on extensions of tim

Post date: Thursday, November 11, 2004
Photo of Robert J. Keach
Robert J. Keach

The “good-faith filing” doctrine has generated recent precedent and more than a little controversy.

Post date: Thursday, November 11, 2004
Photo of Richard J. Astor
Richard J. Astor

ABI Business Reorganization Committee

Post date: Thursday, January 01, 2004

At first blush, the recent decision of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court in In re Fleming Companies, Inc., 2003 WL 23018828 (Bankr. D. Del.

Post date: Thursday, January 01, 2004

A decision out of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York raises questions about what many have considered to be a routine order in large chapter 11 cases. In In re: Spiegel, Inc., 2003 Bankr.

Post date: Monday, May 05, 2003
Photo of Stephen C. Hunt
Stephen C. Hunt

The allowance of claims and recovery of avoidable transfers are important, complementary principles in the adjustment of the debtor-creditor relationship.

Post date: Monday, May 05, 2003
Photo of Patricia B. Fugée
Patricia B. Fugée

Section 365(d)(3) requires chapter 11 debtors to timely perform all obligations “arising from and after the order for relief under any unexpired lease of nonresidential real property, until such lease is assumed or rejected.” Section 365(d)(3) specifically provides that such sums are due “notwithstanding §503(b)(1).” Thus, obligations

Post date: Monday, May 05, 2003

Two recent Delaware cases illustrate how courts continue to scrutinize so-called “breakup fees” payable to “stalking horse” bidders in bankruptcy sales.

Pages

Mr. Robert S. Marticello
Co-Chair
Smiley Wang-Ekvall, LLP
Costa Mesa, CA
(714) 445-1000

Ms. Jordana L. Renert
Co-Chair
Lowenstein Sandler LLP
New York, NY
(212) 419-5963

Mr. Jacob Frumkin, Esq.
Communications Manager
Cole Schotz P.C.
Hackensack, NJ
(646) 563-8944

Ms. Jamie J. Fell
Education Director
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
New York, NY
(212) 455-3822

Ms. Krista L. Kulp
Newsletter Editor
Cole Schotz P.C.
Hackensack, NY
(201) 525-6317

Mr. Bradley A. Cosman
Special Projects Leader
Perkins Coie LLP
Phoenix, AZ
(602) 351-8205

Please note that in order to view the content for the Committee Newsletters you must either sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member