The Ninth Circuit and the BAP Draw Opposite Conclusions from the Same Testimony

July 1, 2020

The Ninth Circuit and the BAP Draw Opposite Conclusions from the Same Testimony

For the circuit court, scant evidence is enough to uphold the trial court’s findings of fact.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Soluta dolorem consequuntur corporis pariatur rem aliquam similique animi fugiat iure explicabo eius omnis minima labore natus, repellat aut odio fuga vero. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Soluta dolorem consequuntur corporis pariatur rem aliquam similique animi fugiat iure explicabo eius omnis minima labore natus, repellat aut odio fuga vero.

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Soluta dolorem consequuntur corporis pariatur remaliquam similique animi fugiat iure explicabo eius omnis minima labore natus, repellat aut odio fuga vero. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur, adipisicing elit. Soluta dolorem consequuntur corporis pariatur remaliquam similique animi fugiat iure explicabo eius omnis minima labore natus, repellat aut odio fuga vero.

ABI MEMBERS ONLY

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary. Please Sign in using your ABI Member credentials.

Not a Member yet? Try Us Out!

Sign up to receive Rochelle's Daily Wire and try out our membership for 30 days. When you do — you'll see why our members "Think ABI First."

Learn More

Case Details

Case Citation

The opinions are Keyword Rockstar Inc. v. Schultz, 19-60031 (9th Cir. June 25, 2020); and Schultz v. Keyword Rockstar Inc. (In re Schultz), 18-1269 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. June 4, 2019).

Case Name

Keyword Rockstar Inc. v. Schultz, 19-60031 (9th Cir. June 25, 2020); and Schultz v. Keyword Rockstar Inc. (In re Schultz), 18-1269 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. June 4, 2019).

Case Type

Business

Court

9th Circuit

Bankruptcy Tags

Practice and Procedure

Consumer Bankruptcy

Discharge/Dischargeability