Bankruptcy Brief

Analysis: Reports of a “Debtor Bar” for PPP Loans Have Been “Exaggerated”

ABI Bankruptcy Brief

July 2, 2020

 
ABI Bankruptcy Brief
 
 
 
 
NEWS AND ANALYSIS

Analysis: Reports of a “Debtor Bar” for PPP Loans Have Been “Exaggerated”

by Thomas J. Salerno Stinson, LLP (Phoenix)

In my learned colleague Bill Rochelle’s June 24 Rochelle’s Daily Wire, the headline blares, “Fifth Circuit Bars Debtors from Receiving ‘PPP’ Loans Under the CARES Act.” Bill’s headline is not unique; many law firm blogs have been reporting the same thing. Yet as my good colleague acknowledged, the headline (while certainly eye-catching, as headlines are wont to be) fails to tell the whole story. As reported accurately by Bill Rochelle: “In record time, the Fifth Circuit granted a direct appeal and reversed the bankruptcy court on June 22, ruling that the Small Business Act bars the bankruptcy court from entering an injunction that requires the Small Business Administration to grant a so-called PPP loan to a company in bankruptcy.” While the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) was set to expire on June 30, that very night the Senate introduced legislation to extend it another six weeks, as there is a whopping undisbursed $130 billion still left in the federal giveaway grab bag. The House voted on July 1 to approve the extension to Aug. 8. The June 22, 2020, three-page decision by the Fifth Circuit did not hold that debtors were barred from the PPP Loan program, nor did the Fifth Circuit give judicial blessing to the now infamous April 24, 2020, regulation promulgated by the Small Business Administration (SBA) that automatically disqualified debtors from participating in the PPP (the “SBA Bankruptcy Rule”). Rather, the court ruled on the very narrow issue of whether the bankruptcy court in Hidalgo (the first court in the country to issue the injunction in question) could enjoin the SBA. As stated by the Fifth Circuit: “The issue at hand is not the validity or wisdom of the PPP regulations and related statutes, but the ability of a court to enjoin the Administrator, whether in regard to the PPP or any other circumstance. Because, under well-established Fifth Circuit law, the bankruptcy court exceeded its authority when it issued an injunction against the SBA Administrator, we VACATE its preliminary injunction.” 

U.S. Unemployment Rate Decreased to 11.1 Percent in June

The jobless rate fell to 11.1 percent in June as the U.S. regained 4.8 million jobs, continuing a labor market rebound from the economic shock caused by the coronavirus pandemic, the Wall Street Journal reported. Job growth in June followed May’s payroll gain of 2.7 million and showed that people are getting back to work faster than anticipated. Still, the U.S. labor market is operating with about 15 million fewer jobs than in February, the month before the pandemic struck the U.S. economy, and a recent coronavirus rise could hamper the job market’s recovery. The June unemployment rate was down from 13.3 percent in May, even though there were significantly more workers who were accurately counted as unemployed in June compared with previous surveys during the pandemic, according to the Labor Department. The jobless rate is still at historically high levels. Until March, before the coronavirus drove the U.S. into a deep recession, the unemployment rate had been hovering at around a 50-year low of 3.5 percent. Some states are reversing or pausing reopening plans as coronavirus infections surge in the South and West. Today’s jobs report, which is based on survey data largely collected in mid-June, doesn’t reflect those recent government-mandated business closures and related layoffs. Employers in sectors such as retail, health care and manufacturing added jobs in June. Companies recalled workers who were temporarily laid off due to the pandemic, helping drive down the number of unemployed Americans on temporary layoff by about 5 million from May to June. Meanwhile, the number who permanently lost their jobs increased by about 600,000 over that period. (Subscription required.)



In a separate Department of Labor report, an additional 1.427 million Americans filed for unemployment benefits in the week ending June 27, YahooFinance.com reported. The prior week’s figure was revised slightly higher to 1.482 million from the previously reported 1.480 million. Weekly jobless claims have decelerated for 13 consecutive weeks; however, more than 48 million Americans have filed for unemployment insurance over the past 15 weeks. Closely watched continuing claims, which lag behind initial jobless claims data by one week, totaled 19.29 during the week ending June 20, up from 19.23 million in the prior week. Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) program claims, which include those who were previously ineligible for unemployment insurance such as self-employed and contracted workers, were also closely monitored in today’s report. PUA claims totaled 839,563 on an unadjusted basis in the week ending June 27, down from the prior week’s 881,242.

Senate Democrats Offer Plan to Extend Added Jobless Benefits During Pandemic

Senate Democrats yesterday unveiled legislation to extend a generous federal increase of weekly unemployment benefits that would continue as long as the coronavirus pandemic affects the economy, The Hill reported. The American Workforce Rescue Act, introduced by Senate Democratic Leader Charles Schumer (N.Y.) and Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), would extend the $600 federal increase in weekly unemployment benefits beyond July 31, when the current federal enhancement of benefits is due to expire. That initial federal boost to weekly state unemployment benefits was included in the CARES Act signed into law in late March, but it has come under fierce criticism from Republicans, who say the benefit is so generous that it has created a disincentive for workers to return to low- and middle-income jobs. The Schumer-Wyden proposal would extend the $600 increase in weekly unemployment insurance (UI) benefits past July 31 until a time when a state’s three-month average total unemployment rate falls below 11 percent. The federal benefit would drop from $600 a week by $100 for every percentage point decrease in the state’s unemployment rate, until that rate falls below 6 percent, according to a summary of the proposal provided by their offices.

Next Wednesday's Happy Hour Starts at 8 p.m. ET! RSVP and Bring a Colleague!

Fed Officials Raised Concerns in June that U.S. Could Enter a Much Worse Recession Later this Year if Coronavirus Cases Continued to Surge

Federal Reserve officials raised concerns about additional waves of coronavirus infections disrupting economic recovery and triggering a new spike in unemployment and a worse economic downturn, according to minutes released yesterday by the central bank about its June 9-10 meeting, the Washington Post reported. Fed Chair Jerome H. Powell has repeatedly said that the path out of this recession, which began in February, will depend on containing the virus and giving Americans the confidence to resume normal working and spending habits. But the notes from the two-day meeting reveal how interconnected Fed officials view a prolonged economic recession and the pandemic’s continued spread — and why Powell often asserts that lawmakers will need to do more to carry millions of Americans out of this crisis. “In light of the significant uncertainty and downside risks associated with the pandemic, including how much the economy would weaken and how long it would take to recover, the staff judged that a more pessimistic projection was no less plausible than the baseline forecast,” the minutes read. “In this scenario, a second wave of the coronavirus outbreak, with another round of strict limitations on social interactions and business operations, was assumed to begin later this year, leading to a decrease in real GDP, a jump in the unemployment rate, and renewed downward pressure on inflation next year.”

Analysis: Companies Hit by COVID-19 Want Insurance Payouts; Insurers Say No

A cavalcade of restaurateurs, retailers and others hurt by pandemic shutdowns have sued to force their insurers to cover billions in business losses, the Wall Street Journal reported. Millions of businesses across the U.S. carry “business interruption” insurance. The pandemic, no question, interrupted their businesses. But insurance companies have largely refused to pay claims under this coverage, citing a standard requirement for physical damage. That is a legacy of its origins in the early 1900s as part of property insurance protecting manufacturers from broken boilers or other failing equipment that closed factories. The insurance is also known as “business income” coverage. More than half of property policies in force today specifically exclude viruses, although the firms filing the lawsuits mostly hold policies without that exclusion. Their argument for getting around the physical-damage requirement is that the coronavirus sticks to surfaces and renders workplaces unsafe. Lawyers have found past rulings that say events rendering a property unusable may constitute property damage. Hundreds of lawsuits have been filed, and lawyers anticipate many more. Some plaintiffs’ lawyers speculate the issue could deal losses to insurers rivaling their liability from asbestos litigation about 30 years ago, which was about $100 billion, according to A.M. Best Co. A Wells Fargo Securities analyst puts insurers’ worst-case business-interruption liability at $25 billion, which would match losses from some Category 5 hurricanes. (Subscription required.)

U.S. Farmers Scramble for Help as COVID-19 Scuttles Immigrant Workforce

The novel coronavirus delayed the arrival of seasonal immigrants who normally help harvest U.S. wheat, leaving farmers to depend on high school students, school bus drivers, laid-off oilfield workers and others to run machines that bring in the crop, Reuters reported. As combines work their way north from the Southern Plains of Texas and Oklahoma, farmers and harvesting companies are having a harder time finding and keeping workers. Any delays in the harvest could send wheat prices higher and cause a scramble to secure supplies to make bread and pasta. The United States is the world’s No. 3 exporter of wheat, a crop in high demand during the pandemic. A sustained labor shortage could further impact the soy and corn harvests that start in September. Farmers, who have been loyal supporters of U.S. President Donald Trump, have grown more reliant on immigrant labor in recent years. The Trump administration continues to issue agriculture visas while clamping down on tech workers, students and other groups. Custom harvesters, or companies hired to gather crops by small-scale farmers who do not own their own equipment, also employ migrants. They roll up to a thousand combines across the U.S. Great Plains and Midwest at harvest time, handling about 30 percent of the U.S. wheat crop. The number of H-2A visas granted for agriculture equipment operators rose to 10,798 from October through March, the typical hiring period for harvesters looking for a labor force that starts cutting wheat in May. That was up 49 percent from a year earlier, according to the U.S. Labor Department. But many of those workers were unable to make it to the United States by the time the harvesters set off on their annual trek, according to eight harvesting companies and farmers interviewed by Reuters. Travel restrictions, tighter border controls and virus fears around the globe have led to delays in workers getting out of their home countries.

Coronavirus Surge Strains Municipal Bond Market, but Investors Still Pile In

The recent surge in COVID-19 cases has brought more bad news for a municipal bond market already reeling from the impact of coast-to-coast shutdowns and record unemployment, the Wall Street Journal reported. The U.S. Virgin Islands Water and Power Authority yesterday narrowly avoided default. The utility got a badly needed reprieve when Chicago-based Nuveen LLC agreed to accept a $34 million payment due Wednesday on Aug. 31 instead. Analysts question whether the territory has enough money on hand to make the payment. The territory isn’t alone in facing pressure. Ten municipal borrowers defaulted for the first time in May and another 10 did in June, the highest for those months since 2012, when borrowers were still absorbing hits from the 2008 financial crisis, according to Municipal Market Analytics data. Many municipal borrowers are being crushed by the massive falloff in the collection of sales, income and hotel taxes, airport fees and other revenues. Even some investment-grade issuers are showing signs of serious strain in their abilities to pay future debts. Despite the pressure on issuers, some investors are seeing opportunity rather than a reason for panic. Even with coronavirus losses weighing heavily on the roughly $4 trillion municipal market, investors are piling back into municipal debt, hungry for yield and seeking more safety than the stock market can provide. Many fled munis in droves when the U.S. first shut down in March, but investors seem to have overcome their initial fears and have plowed about $11 billion back into muni mutual funds since mid-May, more than one-third of the amount withdrawn in March and early April, according to Refinitiv. (Subscription required.)

Where Can You Earn Up to 5.1 Hours of CLE, Including 1.2 Hours of Ethics, for Just $100? At ABI’s Southeast Virtual Bankruptcy Workshop!

The 2020 Southeast Virtual Bankruptcy Workshop on July 24 provides you with an innovative online program bringing together regional judges and top practitioners for an afternoon of interactive and informative programming. Earn up to 5.1 hours of CLE credit, including 1.2 hours of ethics, and engage in valuable networking with regional colleagues — all from the comfort of your home — for only $100. Register here.

Sign up Today to Receive Rochelle’s Daily Wire by E-mail!
Have you signed up for Rochelle’s Daily Wire in the ABI Newsroom? Receive Bill Rochelle’s exclusive perspectives and analyses of important case decisions via e-mail!

Tap into Rochelle’s Daily Wire via the ABI Newsroom and Twitter!

BLOG EXCHANGE

New on ABI’s Bankruptcy Blog Exchange: How COVID-19 Could Alter the Regulatory Landscape

The 2008 financial crisis transformed banking regulations. A recent blog post examines how those changes have held up in the current recession, and what might be coming next amid the COVID-19 economic downturn.

To read more on this blog and all others on the ABI Blog Exchange, please click here.

 
© 2020 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314
 

U.S. Weekly Jobless Claims Fall; But a Record 32.9 Million on Unemployment Benefits

ABI Bankruptcy Brief

July 9, 2020

 
ABI Bankruptcy Brief
 
 
 
 
NEWS AND ANALYSIS

U.S. Weekly Jobless Claims Fall; But a Record 32.9 Million on Unemployment Benefits

New applications for U.S. jobless benefits fell last week, but a record 32.9 million Americans were collecting unemployment checks in the third week of June, Reuters reported. Economists cautioned against reading too much into the drop in weekly jobless claims reported by the Labor Department on Thursday, noting that the period included the July 4 Independence Day. Claims data are volatile around holidays. Large parts of the country, including densely populated states like Florida, Texas and California, are dealing with record spikes of new COVID-19 cases, which have forced a scaling back or pausing of reopenings and sent some workers home again. Initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped 99,000 to a seasonally adjusted 1.314 million for the week ended July 4. That was the 14th straight weekly decline. The number of people receiving benefits after an initial week of aid dipped 698,000 to 18.062 million in the week ending June 27. These so-called continued claims, which are reported with a one-week lag, topped out at a record 24.912 million in early May. There were 32.9 million people receiving unemployment checks under all programs in the third week of June, up 1.411 million from the middle of the month.

White House Expects New Round of Stimulus Funds to Individuals by End of July

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said today that the Trump administration is working with the Senate to pass a new bill for coronavirus-related economic aid by the end of July, as enhanced unemployment benefits near expiration, the Wall Street Journal reported. Mnuchin said the administration supports a second round of so-called economic impact payments to households, an extension of enhanced unemployment benefits for furloughed workers, and a “much, much more targeted” version of the Paycheck Protection Program of forgivable loans for small businesses. “As soon as the Senate gets back, we’re going to sit down on a bipartisan basis with the Republicans and the Democrats, and it will be our priority to make sure between the 20th and the end of the month that we pass the next legislation,” Mnuchin said. House Democrats in May passed a $3.5 trillion bill that would extend the $600 in extra weekly unemployment payments through December, send households more stimulus checks and provide $1 trillion to state and local governments whose revenues have been hit by the pandemic. Senate Republicans have postponed deliberations on the next round of stimulus until July 20, leaving little time to reach a consensus before the unemployment supplement expires. Republican leaders have expressed concern that enhanced jobless benefits discourage people from returning to work as the economy reopens. “We knew there was a problem with the enhanced unemployment in that [in] certain cases, people were paid more than they made in their jobs,” Mnuchin said, adding that he hoped to cap the next round of benefits at 100 percent of a worker’s original income. Weekly unemployment benefits normally average less than $400 a week. Mnuchin indicated that the next round of extra benefits might be aimed at workers in industries hardest hit by the coronavirus pandemic and resulting lockdowns. (Subscription required.)

Renters Face Financial Cliff Ahead; Limited Help Available

People who rent have largely been able to survive the initial months of the pandemic helped by unemployment and federal relief checks. But the extra $600 in unemployment benefits ceases at the end of July and local eviction moratoriums are expiring, the Associated Press reported. There is no agreement between the White House and Congress on a second federal relief package. More broadly, there are fewer supports in place for renters than for homeowners. And as a jump in virus cases in numerous states nationwide adds more uncertainty to the economy and job market, many who rent are facing a precarious future. “It’s an incredibly stressful situation for renters,” said Bruce McClary, spokesman for the National Foundation for Credit Counseling, a nonprofit that works directly with consumers. “I don’t know what lies in the road ahead.” Renters already faced a dire situation before the pandemic hit, said Alexander Hermann, a researcher at the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies. The center reported in January that vacancy rates for rentals had hit the lowest level in decades, pushing up rent far faster than income. At last count, one in four renters spent more than half their income on housing. Then came the pandemic, which hit renters particularly hard financially. U.S. Census data shows about 19% of renters were late or deferred their rent payments in May. And about 31 percent of renters surveyed in June said they have little to no confidence they will be able to pay next month’s rent.

Service Sector in U.S. Shows Signs of Recovery

U.S. services industries showed signs of recovery in June as businesses took early steps to reopen following the easing of some of the coronavirus-related lockdowns, according to two surveys of purchasing managers released on Monday, the Wall Street Journal reported. But analysts warned those gains could be undone in July as a resurgence of cases in some states leads to another shutdown of businesses. Businesses in both surveys reported last month that demand had started to stabilize and that exports were starting to pick up. The pace of job cuts slowed with some companies starting to hire again. Prices rose, another sign of renewed demand. Survey respondents also said they were increasingly optimistic about the outlook, even though overall business confidence remains subdued. An index of service activity compiled by data firm IHS Markit registered 47.9 in June, up from 37.5 in May. The reading suggests that while economic activity in the U.S. services sector continues to contract, it is doing so at a slower pace. Readings of 50 or above are a sign of expansion while readings below 50 signal contractions. A separate index compiled by the Institute for Supply Management posted 57.1 in June, the first month-over-month expansion following two straight months of contraction. The service sector, especially the hospitality and accommodation industry, was hard-hit by the shutdowns this spring. Private service employers shed 17.4 million jobs in April before clawing back 2.5 million in May and another 4.3 million June, according to the Labor Department. (Subscription required.)

Consumer Borrowing in May Decreased for Third Consecutive Month Amid Pandemic

U.S. consumers reduced their borrowing for a third-straight month in May as the millions of jobs lost because of the coronavirus pandemic made households less eager to take on new debt, the Associated Press reported. The Federal Reserve reported yesterday that consumer borrowing declined by $18.3 billion in May, a drop of 5.3 percent. Borrowing had fallen 4.5 percent in March and then plunged 20.1 percent in April. That was the biggest one-month decline in percentage terms since the end of World War II. Borrowing by consumers in the category that covers credit card debt fell $24.3 billion in May after April's record $58.2 billion decline. Borrowing in the category that covers auto loans and student debt rose $6 billion, reversing part of a $12 billion decline in April. The Trump administration is forecasting a sharp rebound in the July-September quarter but private economists are worried that the resurgence of coronavirus cases in recent weeks in many areas may put the recovery at risk. It marked the first time in a decade that overall consumer borrowing has fallen for three straight months. The declines left total borrowing at a seasonally adjusted $4.11 trillion in May.

Commentary: Apollo’s Debt-Lawsuit Defeat to Reshape Wall Street Risk Models*

When Apollo Global Management Inc. and its allies sued struggling mattress maker Serta Simmons Bedding for giving an unfair advantage to creditors providing fresh cash, many on Wall Street snickered, according to a Bloomberg commentary. But when the private equity giant and partners including Angelo Gordon & Co. lost the lawsuit, the snickering stopped. The ruling could turn the Serta Simmons transaction into a playbook for restructuring debt that undermines a central tenet of credit markets and hands distressed borrowers a source of leverage over lenders, just as the pandemic sparks a surge in showdowns between the two sides, according to the commentary. If creditors can now be pushed down the repayment pecking order without notice and have no recourse to fight back, they will be forced to reassess risk — and potentially demand higher interest rates — when granting loans and buying certain kinds of bonds. The Serta Simmons deal was “particularly aggressive,” said Elisabeth de Fontenay, a professor at Duke University School of Law and a former corporate lawyer. “You could absolutely see it being a big problem for credit markets.”



*The views expressed in this commentary are from the author/publication cited, are meant for informative purposes only, and are not an official position of ABI.

Fed’s $600 Billion Lending Program Will See More Interest if Economy Slumps, Official Says

The Federal Reserve’s $600 billion lending program for medium-size businesses hasn’t attracted much interest yet, but that is likely to change if the U.S. economy takes a turn for the worse amid rising coronavirus cases, said the official who runs the program, the Wall Street Journal reported. “The likelihood that we continue to have serious problems with the infections means that businesses are likely to be disrupted for a longer period of time,” said Eric Rosengren, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. “So there’s an insurance element against the pandemic, as well as meeting an immediate need of some borrowers.” The Main Street Lending Program aims to lend to companies contending with the economic fallout from the pandemic, but it has struggled to get off the ground since it was announced in April. Its rollout was held up by negotiations over terms, while bankers have expressed skepticism that many borrowers that need help will be eligible to access the loans. Of the five largest U.S. banks by assets, only Bank of America Corp. has indicated that it plans to make Main Street loans available to new customers. Three others — Wells Fargo & Co., Citigroup Inc. and U.S. Bancorp. — said they plan only to serve existing customers. JPMorgan Chase & Co. didn’t say whether it planned to lend to new customers through the program. Almost 11,000 federally insured banks and credit unions could be eligible. Rosengren said that 260 lenders have completed the registration process, while another 174 are still signing up. He acknowledged that it is “going to take some time for banks and borrowers to become familiar with the program” but that he fully expects demand to pick up. (Subscription required.)

Upcoming abiLIVE Webinars Look at Evolution of Consumer Bankruptcy Practice in the COVID-19 Era, Distressed Debt Market Trends and Evolving M&A Activity

Three upcoming abiLIVE webinars present experts looking at key issues to both consumer and business bankruptcy practice:

- Sponsored by ABI's Consumer Bankruptcy Committee, the "Evolution of Consumer Bankruptcy Practice in the COVID-19 Era" abiLIVE webinar on July 17 will look at what trends for consumer bankruptcy practice have emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic and what consumer practice will look like going forward. Featured speakers include John Crane of Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid & Crane LLC (Duluth, Ga.), Jenny L. Doling of J. Doling Law, PC (Palm Desert, CA) and Charissa Potts of Freedom Law PC (Eastpointe, Mich.) with chapter 13 trustee Margaret A. Burks (Cincinnati) serving as moderator. Register here for free.

- SRS Acquiom will sponsor a special abiLIVE roundtable on Distressed Debt Market Trends on July 21. The discussion on current trends will include how we got here, what we're seeing, and how today's market compares to other distressed times. Experts will also provide their viewpoints on how COVID-19 is turning lending markets upside-down, and provide tips on how best to respond to the challenging times. Speakers include Harrison Denman of White & Case LLP (New York), Thomas Finnigan, IV, of White Oak Financial, LLC (San Francisco), Samantha Good of Kirkland & Ellis LLP (San Francisco), Renee Kuhl of SRS Acquiom (Minneapolis), Eric McDonald of SRS Acquiom (New Orleans) and Paul St. Mauro Seaport Global Securities LLC (New York). Register here for free.

- Sponsored by Prosakuer, the "Evolving Landscape of Distressed M&A Activity" abiLIVE webinar on July 22 will highlight the current challenges facing insolvency professionals working on deals in the COVID-19 world and what to expect in the coming months. Featured speakers include Harold Bordwin of Keen-Summit (New York), Jeff Marwil of Proskauer (Chicago) and Rich Morgner of Jeffries (New York). Register here for free.

Sign up Today to Receive Rochelle’s Daily Wire by E-mail!
Have you signed up for Rochelle’s Daily Wire in the ABI Newsroom? Receive Bill Rochelle’s exclusive perspectives and analyses of important case decisions via e-mail!

Tap into Rochelle’s Daily Wire via the ABI Newsroom and Twitter!

BLOG EXCHANGE

New on ABI’s Bankruptcy Blog Exchange: CFPB Declares Most Agency Rules Still Valid after Supreme Court Decision

The agency sought to provide certainty that most actions from the past eight years remain in effect despite the ruling that the bureau's leadership structure is unconstitutional, according to a recent blog post.

To read more on this blog and all others on the ABI Blog Exchange, please click here.

 
© 2020 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314
 

Democratic Senators Push Bill Allowing Student Loans to Be Absolved in Bankruptcy

ABI Bankruptcy Brief

July 23, 2020

 
ABI Bankruptcy Brief
 
 
 
 
NEWS AND ANALYSIS

Democratic Senators Push Bill Allowing Student Loans to Be Absolved in Bankruptcy

Democratic Senators introduced a bill today that would allow people to cancel student loan debt in bankruptcy if they can show income loss tied to economic fallout from the coronavirus pandemic, the Wall Street Journal reported. The measure from Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) and Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) would allow student loan cancellations for people who either racked up large medical bills in the past three years or lost wages because of the coronavirus fallout. Republicans have expressed concerns that widespread student loan cancellations will cause the cost of higher education to rise, and earlier attempts to ease student loan restrictions for bankrupt borrowers have failed. Rising costs could make that education less accessible, according to those who oppose easing standards for forgiving student loan debt. A 1970s federal law requires people who take out student loans to prove an undue hardship in repaying their loans before canceling them. Over time, bankruptcy judges who have decided case by case have set a high bar. Only several thousand student-loan borrowers have tried to cancel their loans in recent years, despite more than $1.5 trillion worth of student-loan debt outstanding as of March, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Several earlier bills to ease student-loan restrictions for bankrupt borrowers have failed without support from Republicans. The bill from Sens. Whitehouse and Brown expands protections for people who file for bankruptcy, stating that people who lost income during the pandemic or because of a health care crisis should have easier access to a fresh financial start. It also has relief for homeowners who have equity in their property. The bill, called the Medical Bankruptcy Fairness Act, also has the backing of Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.).

Analysis: Ann Taylor Parent’s Bankruptcy Is the Scariest Yet

In the latest example of how the world of brick-and-mortar retail is being overwhelmed by the pandemic, specialty apparel conglomerate Ascena Retail Group Inc. — corporate parent of Ann Taylor, Lane Bryant and other chains —  filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Ascena may not have the cultural primacy of some of the other prominent names in the industry that have recently filed for bankruptcy, but make no mistake: Ascena’s bankruptcy is the scariest yet for the industry in the COVID-19 era, because the company’s collapse has the potential to create more devastating ripple effects than were caused by almost any of the other retail washouts that preceded it, according to an analysis in the Washington Post. Ascena had nearly 2,800 stores as of February, a staggeringly large portfolio that includes Loft and kids’ shop Justice. That makes it a highly important tenant for many mall operators. The company accounted for 4.7% of annualized base rent at Tanger Factory Outlet Centers Inc., according to that operator’s latest quarterly filing, a share that makes Ascena its second-largest tenant behind only Gap Inc. For Simon Property Group Inc., only Gap and Victoria’s Secret parent L Brands Inc. account for a greater share of annual base rent than Ascena. It is in the top 10 for Brookfield Property Partners and Acadia Realty Trust. Customers may have returned to stores at a faster clip than some retailers anticipated, but traffic generally remains at levels the industry was not built to sustain. Meanwhile, the U.S. is seeing an uptick in COVID-19 cases, and the June unemployment rate was 11.1%. That leaves clothing retailers in an especially difficult position — and it almost certainly means more of them will be joining Ascena in bankruptcy, according to the analysis.

Commentary: No More Blank Checks from Congress for Coronavirus*

A near-record 158.8 million Americans were employed in February, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Then the novel coronavirus brought parts of the economy to a screeching halt. As of June, 142.2 million people were employed, a reduction of 16.6 million, or about 10.5%. Recent economic forecasts have predicted a decline in gross domestic product of between 4.6% and 8% for 2020. The damage from COVID-19 has been significant, but not catastrophic, according to a commentary in the Wall Street Journal. Congress authorized $2.9 trillion of COVID-19 relief, which represents 13.5% of 2019’s U.S. GDP. No one knows exactly how much of the COVID relief has been spent or obligated, but 60% ($1.75 trillion) seems to be a consensus figure in Congress. We’ve authorized enough spending to replace 13.5% of annual economic output, and more than $1 trillion of it hasn’t yet been spent or obligated. So why is Congress rushing to pass at least $1 trillion more? The House has passed an additional $3 trillion in COVID-19 relief, which would bring the total to $5.9 trillion, 27.5% of GDP. Again, employment has declined 10.5%, and respected estimates of GDP decline are 8% or less. Why should Congress provide financial support greater than the reduction in GDP? When Congress passed the $2.9 trillion in March, there was a great deal of uncertainty and a danger of economic collapse. Congress had to act quickly and demonstrate that sufficient financial support would be provided. But we’ve weathered that storm and now have much more information. We don’t know how much of the $2.9 trillion allocated for economic relief has been spent. Congress hasn’t conducted sufficient oversight of its previous handiwork. We shouldn’t authorize another dime until we do so, according to the commentary.

*The views expressed in this commentary are from the author/publication cited, are meant for informative purposes only, and are not an official position of ABI.


Commentary: The Sacklers Could Get Away with It*

The billionaire Sacklers, who own Purdue Pharma, maker of the OxyContin painkiller that helped fuel America’s opioid epidemic, are among America’s richest families. And if they have their way, the federal court handling Purdue’s bankruptcy case will help them hold on to their wealth by releasing them from liability for the ravages caused by OxyContin, according to a commentary in the New York Times. The July 30 deadline for filing claims in Purdue’s bankruptcy proceedings potentially implicates not just claims against Purdue, but also claims against the Sacklers, who may yet again benefit from the expansive powers that bankruptcy courts exercise in complex cases. So far, the bankruptcy court has granted injunctions stopping proceedings in several hundred lawsuits charging that Sackler family members directed the aggressive marketing campaign for OxyContin; it and other opioids have been implicated in the addictions of millions of patients and the deaths of several hundred thousand. The Sacklers have offered $3 billion in the hope that the bankruptcy court will impose a global settlement of OxyContin litigation. Under this settlement, all claims against the Sacklers, even by families who lost loved ones to opioids, would be forever extinguished. The Sacklers would walk away with an estimated several billion of OxyContin profits while leaving unresolved a crucial question asked by victims and their families: Did the Sacklers create and coordinate fraudulent marketing that helped make their best-selling drug a deadly national scourge? With that question left unanswered, many of those injured by OxyContin would feel victimized again, according to the commentary.

*The views expressed in this commentary are from the author/publication cited, are meant for informative purposes only, and are not an official position of ABI.


U.S. Weekly Jobless Claims Unexpectedly Rise as Labor Market Takes Step Back

The number of Americans filing for unemployment benefits unexpectedly rose last week for the first time in nearly four months, suggesting the labor market was stalling amid a resurgence in new COVID-19 cases and depressed demand, Reuters reported. The weekly jobless claims report from the Labor Department today, the most timely data on the economy’s health, also showed that nearly 32 million people were collecting unemployment checks in early July. Relentless labor market weakness puts pressure on the U.S. Congress to extend a $600 weekly jobless benefit supplement, which expires on July 31. “There is no gradual and uneven recovery for the labor market,” said Chris Rupkey, chief economist at MUFG in New York. “Washington policymakers looking for signs that additional stimulus is necessary can judge for themselves with the millions and millions of jobless workers getting unemployment benefits. The economy cannot carry on for long if it has to drag almost 32 million unemployed workers with it.” Initial claims for state unemployment benefits increased 109,000 to a seasonally adjusted 1.416 million for the week ended July 18. That was the first rise in applications since the week ending March 28, when claims raced to a record 6.867 million as nonessential businesses like restaurants and gyms were shuttered to slow the spread of the coronavirus. “The risk from repeated business closures is that temporary job losses will become permanent,” said Rubeela Farooqi, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics in White Plains, New York. “This could result in an even slower pace of recovery.”

Analysis: The Economy Usually Recovers Quickly Once Pandemics End

The COVID-19 pandemic has devastated the global economy. The World Bank’s Global Economic Prospects report for June forecasts that the world economy will shrink by an average of 5.2 percent in the coming year, making this the worst recession since World War II. It further predicts a decline in per capita income of 3.6 percent, bringing with it the threat of starvation to millions of the world’s poorest people. While the June jobs report in the U.S. was surprisingly good, with an unprecedented 4.8 million new jobs being added, the subsequent dramatic resurgence of the virus has led again to pessimism about the economy, as Congress begins work on another trillion-plus-dollar relief package to try to prop up the economy. But whatever passes, a period of acute economic hardship, potentially reaching catastrophic levels in some parts of the world, certainly seems to be inevitable, according to an analysis in the Washington Post. What will be the long-term effects? A historical perspective yields an unexpected insight into the question of the economic consequences of pandemics. Since the Black Death of the mid-14th century, no major pandemic appears to have had a long-lasting, negative economic impact, at least in Europe and North America. In fact, pandemics scarcely register in the standard economic histories, let alone get identified as major turning points. There is ample evidence that the short-term economic effects will be severe, although it is mere conjecture to know whether these consequences will endure. But even if they do, even if the coronavirus is the anomaly among pandemics in this respect, the more interesting question would be to ask: Why? Would it be because of the greater integration of the world economy? Or would it be because of the greater importance of the service sector?

National Mortgage Delinquency Rate Improves for First Time Since January

For the first time in five months, the national delinquency rate improved, falling to 7.6% in June as the number of past-due mortgages fell by 98,000, according to Black Knight, DSNews reported. This comes after the delinquency rate rose from 3.2% in January to 7.8% in May. Serious delinquencies — those 90 or more days past due — rose by more than 1.2 million as the initial batch of borrowers impacted by COVID-19 missed their third payment. The 1.87 million mortgages labeled as seriously delinquent is the highest level since early 2011. Active foreclosures continue to decline as foreclosure moratoriums are still in place. June’s 192,000 active foreclosures were the fewest on record dating back to 2000. Additionally, prepayment activity hit its highest level in 16 years in June, which Black Knight states is being fueled by record-low mortgage rates. Nationally, 13% of borrowers said they missed a payment vs. 11% in April.

Sign up Today to Receive Rochelle’s Daily Wire by E-mail!
Have you signed up for Rochelle’s Daily Wire in the ABI Newsroom? Receive Bill Rochelle’s exclusive perspectives and analyses of important case decisions via e-mail!

Tap into Rochelle’s Daily Wire via the ABI Newsroom and Twitter!

BLOG EXCHANGE

New on ABI’s Bankruptcy Blog Exchange: Does Congress Have the Cure for What’s Ailing CRE Borrowers?

While many commercial property owners are locked out of existing coronavirus relief by financing terms that bar them from taking new loans, under a House bill they would receive government-backed equity investments, according to a recent blog post.

To read more on this blog and all others on the ABI Blog Exchange, please click here.

 
© 2020 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314
 

Analysis: A New Challenge for Debtors Who Received PPP Loans Under the CARES Act

ABI Bankruptcy Brief

July 30, 2020

 
ABI Bankruptcy Brief
 
 
 
 
NEWS AND ANALYSIS

Analysis: A New Challenge for Debtors Who Received PPP Loans Under the CARES Act

The CARES Act and corresponding paycheck protection program (PPP) provisions continue to provide fertile ground for discourse concerning policy implications and legislative intent amid an unprecedented pandemic, according to an analysis by David M. Barlow of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona in Phoenix. In the early months of implementing the CARES Act’s PPP provisions, the bankruptcy world was particularly fraught with such debate. Courts across the country grappled with the SBA’s authority to enforce rules prohibiting access to the $659 billion of relief afforded to small businesses solely based on their status as debtors in bankruptcy. Although that phase of litigation appears to have concluded, debtors who received PPP loans and are now seeking loan forgiveness may need to clear a new hurdle. Specifically, lenders of the PPP loans may refuse to process a borrower’s application for loan forgiveness because the applicant’s filing of bankruptcy constituted a default under the terms contained in the PPP loans. Despite going to a lot of places and engaging in what has affectionately been referred to by one commentator as the “SBA Tango,” debtors may end up somewhere they have already been: in front of a bankruptcy court seeking the relief necessary to have their PPP loan forgiven.

U.S. Economy Contracted at Fastest Quarterly Rate on Record from April to June as Coronavirus Walloped Workers, Businesses

The U.S. economy shrank 9.5 percent from April through June, the largest quarterly decline since the government began publishing data 70 years ago and the latest, sobering reflection of the pandemic’s economic devastation, the Washington Post reported. The second quarter report on gross domestic product covers some of the economy’s worst weeks in living memory, when commercial activity ground to a halt, millions of Americans lost their jobs and the nation went into lockdown. Yet economists say the data should also serve as a cautionary tale for what is at stake if the recovery slips away, especially as rising coronavirus cases in some states have forced businesses to close once again. On Thursday, the government also reported that jobless claims increased once again last week to 1.4 million, another sign any recovery is stalling out. GDP shrank at an annual rate of 32.9 percent, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. While it usually stresses the annualized rate, that figure is less useful this quarter because the economy is unlikely to experience another collapse like it did in the second quarter. Still, while a tailspin at the second quarter rate is unlikely, the nascent recovery that began appearing earlier this summer appears to be in jeopardy. On Wednesday, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome H. Powell warned that the most recent surge in infections has begun to weigh on the economy, while reemphasizing a recovery cannot be sustained unless the virus is under control.

Republican Stimulus Package May Come with a Benefit for Big Banks

Big banks may get a big gift in the stimulus bill being drafted by Senate Republicans, the New York Times reported. Lawmakers are expected to include language that would give the Federal Reserve authority to relax a requirement surrounding capital levels at the biggest banks, essentially allowing firms to load up on riskier assets. The push is the culmination of a months-long effort by industry lobbyists and a top Federal Reserve official to change a restriction put in place in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis to prevent banks from engaging in risky behavior. Sen. Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, is working on legislation that would give regulators the discretion to let banks exclude certain items on their balance sheets when calculating how much capital they are required to hold. The change could allow banks to be less conservative in their risk-taking than in recent years. It could be particularly useful for banks with large Wall Street trading operations, because it would let them increase their holdings of certain kinds of financial assets, like government bonds, without requiring a corresponding increase in capital reserves. Critics, however, say the leverage ratio is blunt, because it in effect views U.S. government bonds as risky as, say, credit card loans. But backers of the leverage ratio say there are times when even the safest assets can be risky for banks to own. There was evidence for this during the turmoil in the markets in March, when Treasuries were sold off, a major reason the Fed stepped in to support markets.

Fannie, Freddie Earnings Improve Amid Signs of Housing-Market Recovery

Government-controlled mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac said their earnings improved in the second quarter, adding to evidence of a rebound in the U.S. housing market, the Wall Street Journal reported. Fannie Mae, the larger of the two companies, said 5.7% of the single-family loans it guarantees — representing about 972,000 mortgages — had suspended payments as of June 30, down from the 7% it reported May 1, when it released first-quarter earnings. The improvement came amid a decline in unemployment as parts of the economy reopened. More recent government data on unemployment claims, however, suggest that the labor market’s recovery may be stalling amid a resurgence in coronavirus cases. Fannie Mae said Thursday that its net income rose to $2.55 billion in the second quarter from $461 million in the previous three months. Net income in the second quarter of 2019 was $3.43 billion. Fannie’s latest results were buoyed by a decline in credit-related expenses, which had ballooned in the first quarter as the company braced for a wave of homeowners requesting a break on their mortgage payments because of the pandemic. A surge in refinancing activity to a 17-year-high due to record-low interest rates also helped the company’s bottom line. “Housing has been one of the only bright spots in the economy,” said Isaac Boltansky, director of policy research at investment bank Compass Point Research & Trading LLC. “It’s clear that the pandemic has hit certain segments of the economy harder. It’s impacted folks who are less likely to be homeowners.”

Analysis: How Congress Is Preventing a Medicare Bankruptcy During COVID-19

As the novel coronavirus continues to spread throughout the country and shows no signs of cessation, that’s especially bad news for seniors, and in more ways than one, The Hill reported. Everyone knows of the disproportionate health risks the nation’s elderly face from this virus, but the threat it poses to Medicare has received far less attention. It shouldn’t come as a surprise that COVID-19 is running the government program dry. It was already in dire straits before the pandemic. A 2020 trustee report found that parts of it will run out of money as early as 2023 and become insolvent by 2026. However, with Medicare Part B now covering all coronavirus testing costs, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) also waiving Medicare participation conditions, the system could come to a breaking point in a matter of years. Over 61 million Americans — 18 percent of the population — depend on Medicare for their health needs. This month, Sens. John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) introduced the Increasing Access to Biosimilars Act (IABA). This bipartisan bill, previously introduced in the House by Reps. Richard Hudson (R-N.C.), Angie Craig (D-Minn.) and Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), will create a pilot program that incentivizes providers to use low-cost biosimilar drugs in the Medicare program whenever possible. These drugs, developed to be similar to already-existing FDA medicines, cost up to 30 percent less than brand-names, and a 2017 RAND study estimated that they could save the U.S. health care system as much as $150 million over a 10-year period.

Analysis: A Hedge Fund Bailout Highlights How Regulators Ignored Big Risks

As the coronavirus began shuttering the global economy in March, critical parts of U.S. financial markets edged toward collapse. The shock was huge and unexpected, but the vulnerabilities were well known, the legacy of risk-taking outside regulatory reach, according to an analysis in the New York Times. To head off a devastating downward spiral, the Federal Reserve came to Wall Street’s rescue for the second time in a dozen years. As investors sold a vast array of holdings and rushed to the comparative safety of cash, the Fed pledged to become a buyer of last resort to restore calm to critical markets. That backstop bailed out many people and investment firms, including a class of hedge funds that had been caught on the wrong side of a trade with ample risks. The story of that trade — how it went wrong and how it was salvaged — offers a cautionary tale about important issues Congress did not address in the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial law and the Trump administration’s hands-off approach to regulation, according to the analysis. A decade after Dodd-Frank, America’s sweeping post-2008 crisis fix, was signed into law, commercial banks like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America are better regulated and safer, but they may be less willing to help smooth over markets in times of stress. Tougher regulation in the formal banking sector has pushed risk-taking to the shadowy corners of Wall Street — areas that Dodd-Frank left largely untouched. In addition, the powers that policymakers have to deal with persistent vulnerabilities have been undermined by Trump administration officials who entered office seeking to weaken financial rules, according to the analysis. The result is a still-brittle system, one in which financial players rake in profits in good times but the government is forced to save them or leave the economy to suffer when things go awry.

Sign up Today to Receive Rochelle’s Daily Wire by E-mail!
Have you signed up for Rochelle’s Daily Wire in the ABI Newsroom? Receive Bill Rochelle’s exclusive perspectives and analyses of important case decisions via e-mail!

Tap into Rochelle’s Daily Wire via the ABI Newsroom and Twitter!

BLOG EXCHANGE

New on ABI’s Bankruptcy Blog Exchange: States’ Lawsuit Alleges OCC Rule Enables ‘Rent-a-Bank’ Schemes

A complaint filed by New York, California and Illinois argues that the regulation, issued in response to the 2015 Madden decision, undermines state laws intended to protect consumers, according to a recent blog post.

To read more on this blog and all others on the ABI Blog Exchange, please click here.

 
© 2020 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314
 

Shadow Bank Weaknesses Forced Fed’s Market Rescue, Quarles Says

ABI Bankruptcy Brief

July 16, 2020

 
ABI Bankruptcy Brief
 
 
 
 
NEWS AND ANALYSIS

Shadow Bank Weaknesses Forced Fed’s Market Rescue, Quarles Says

A top Federal Reserve official is issuing a warning about fast-growing and largely unregulated shadow lenders: They were a big factor in why central banks had to save markets earlier this year, and much more needs to be done to assess the risks posed by the sector, Bloomberg News reported. The coronavirus crisis has exposed potential weaknesses tied to nonbank financial firms, including excessive leverage, interconnectedness and instances of assets freezing up that investors assumed were akin to cash, according to Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Randal Quarles. Such factors left central banks with no option other than intervening, he said, speaking in his capacity as chairman of the global Financial Stability Board. “While extraordinary central bank interventions calmed capital markets, which remained open and enabled firms to raise new and longer-term financing, such measures should not be required,” Quarles wrote in a letter dated Tuesday to his counterparts at other central banks. It’s “more important than ever” to understand the possible threats of nonbanks, he added. In mid-March, the Fed started rolling out emergency lending facilities focused on ultra-short-term credit markets that dried up as companies, banks and investors began hoarding cash. One of the quickest programs established was the Money Market Fund Liquidity Facility. It was crucial to restoring order because institutional investors began withdrawing rapidly from so-called prime money market funds, vehicles that invest partly in short-term company IOUs. Since the disruption, at least one big provider of institutional prime money funds, Fidelity Investments, announced it would shut down those funds and steer customers mainly into funds that invest exclusively in government-backed securities. Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren reacted by saying he hoped other fund providers would follow suit.

1.3 Million Americans Filed First-Time Unemployment Claims Last Week

The Department of Labor reported this week that another 1.3 million people filed first-time jobless claims on a seasonally adjusted basis for the week ending July 11, CNN Business reported. That's down 10,000 from the prior week's revised level. On an unadjusted basis, more than 1.5 million people filed first-time claims, up almost 109,000 from the week before. The seasonal adjustments are traditionally used to smooth out the data, but that has tended to have the opposite effect during the pandemic. Continued claims, which count workers who have filed claims for at least two weeks in a row, stood at more than 17.3 million for the week ending July 4, down 422,000 from the prior week. These seasonally adjusted claims peaked in May at nearly 25 million. On an unadjusted basis, however, continued claims rose by more than 838,000 to 17.3 million. The federal government spent more than $80 billion in June to pay for Congress's historic enhancement to the nation's jobless program, bringing the total spent to nearly $171.5 billion this fiscal year, Treasury Department data shows. In addition to the pandemic unemployment assistance program and the 13-week extension of benefits, lawmakers also boosted weekly benefits by $600, which the jobless receive in addition to their state payments.



In related news, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) yesterday signaled a willingness to compromise with Republicans on the size of renewed expanded unemployment benefits, which are currently set to expire at the end of the month, The Hill reported. Pelosi indicated that the size of the expansion would depend on whether the next coronavirus relief package includes another round of direct stimulus payments to individuals and families. "That pillar is about putting money into the pockets of the American people. One piece of it is unemployment insurance and the benefit you are talking about, and another part of it is how we put direct payments into the families," she said. "So we'll see what that entire package looks like." GOP lawmakers and the Trump administration have argued that the extra $600 per week in unemployment insurance payments established in March disincentivizes people to return to work if they're collecting more money than they did before the pandemic. But in recent weeks, some have suggested renewing the weekly benefit at a lower amount, such as $400 or less.

U.S. Retail Sales Jump 7.5 Percent in June, but Fresh Coronavirus Outbreak Poses New Hurdle

Sales at U.S. retailers posted a big increase in June for the second month in a row, but a surge in coronavirus cases that’s led to more restrictions on business threatens to sap the momentum of the economic recovery, MarketWatch.com reported. Retail sales climbed 7.5 percent last month following a record 18.2 percent increase in May, the government said today. Sales still haven’t returned to pre-crisis trends, however, after a huge drop in the first two months of the pandemic. The recent upturn could also stall if the virus continues to rage and more states reimpose restrictions on retailers and other businesses that rely on customers visiting their stores. Sales jumped 8.2 percent at auto dealers, which have gotten a big boost from plunging interest rates. Car buyers with secure jobs and good incomes have been snapping up new vehicles to take advantage of low rates. Sales more than doubled at apparel stores and leaped 20 percent at food and drinking establishments, one of the sectors hit hardest by the pandemic. Yet the latest viral outbreaks are putting renewed pressure on them, especially bars. Sales are still 26 percent lower compared to a year ago, and an increasing number of bars and restaurants are closing for good.

The Coronavirus Retail Shakeout: Who’s Closing or Opening Stores

U.S. retailers are on track to close as many as 25,000 stores this year as the coronavirus pandemic is upending shopping habits, the Wall Street Journal reported. That is more than double the 9,832 stores that closed in 2019, according to Coresight Research. So far this year, major U.S. chains have announced more than 5,000 permanent closures. More buying is shifting online, and consumers are spending less than they did a year ago as they shelter at home, get furloughed or lose their jobs. A growing number of chains that were struggling before the health crisis have filed for bankruptcy protection in recent months. “Bankruptcies are driving a lot of the closures,” said Deborah Weinswig, chief executive of Coresight Research, which compiled the data. Many clothing retailers were in bad shape before the pandemic, as consumers shifted spending to travel, entertainment and other experiences, and as new online startups siphoned sales from established players. Gap Inc. and Victoria’s Secret, owned by L Brands Inc., which once dominated the nation’s malls with hundreds of stores, are shrinking. Brooks Brothers Group filed for bankruptcy in July and plans to close 51 stores. Conversely, dollar stores and discounters are bucking the trend. Dollar General Corp. is moving ahead with nearly 1,000 new stores this year, and its rivals Dollar Tree and Family Dollar also are adding hundreds of new locations. With high unemployment and other workers furloughed, these chains are benefiting as shoppers are forced to tighten their purse strings. Department stores were in decline before the pandemic, as shoppers increasingly had been shunning indoor malls. J.C. Penney Inc. and Stage Stores Inc. filed for bankruptcy in May and are pulling back from many malls, and Macy’s Inc. plans to close a fifth of its stores over the next three years. The owner of Sears and Kmart filed for chapter 11 in 2018, and although its assets were bought out of bankruptcy in 2019, it has continued to close stores this year. (Subscription required.)

U.S. Industrial Production Picked Up Again in June

U.S. manufacturing increased in June for a second straight month, a sign of economic recovery in the weeks before the recent surge in coronavirus cases, the Wall Street Journal reported. Industrial production — the measure of output from factories, mines and utilities — rose a seasonally adjusted 5.4 percent in June from May, the Federal Reserve said yesterday. The index for May was unrevised at 1.4 percent, while the index for April was revised down to a 12.7 percent drop from a 12.5 percent drop. As U.S. factories reopened in May and June, they helped drive a recovery from April’s record decline. Still, despite the recent gains, the index for the second quarter as a whole fell at an annual rate of 42.6 percent, the largest quarterly decrease since World War II. (Subscription required.)

COVID-19 Whiplash Jolts California’s Small Businesses

Reopenings throughout California have been damped by capacity restrictions, stringent cleaning protocols, conflicting guidance from authorities at different levels of government and concerned clients. On top of financial challenges, business owners have been wrestling with the fear of putting their employees and customers at risk, the Wall Street Journal reported. After seeing the number of COVID-19 cases across the state rise in recent weeks, Gov. Gavin Newsom Monday ordered a halt to indoor activities at bars, restaurants, salons and gyms — many of them already struggling — less than a month after allowing them to reopen. Small-business owners said that they found the parameters around applying for and spending federal forgivable loans under the Paycheck Protection Program confusing and inconsistent, and said that rent is a bigger problem than payroll anyway. Many rushed to spend PPP funds under the initial rules, which set tight limits on how, and how quickly, they had to be used. Those restrictions have since been relaxed. Business owners and trade groups are calling for more government assistance in light of extended shutdowns. “California won’t be the last state to reverse or delay the return of independent restaurants and bars,” said Caroline Styne, co-founder of high-end Los Angeles restaurant operator Lucques Group and member of the Independent Restaurant Coalition Advisory Board, in a statement urging Congress to pass a relief program for the industry. “Restaurants placing their first supply orders since March can’t turn the delivery trucks around,” she said. “These reclosings are creating more debt for businesses that were just beginning to find their footing after accumulating four months of unpaid bills.” Read more. (Subscription required.)



The "Real Economic Support that Acknowledges Unique Restaurant Assistance Needed to Survive" (RESTAURANTS) Act of 2020, introduced on June 18 by Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.), was one of the measures discussed yesterday at a House Small Business Committee hearing on long-term solutions for small-business recovery. The legislation calls for a $120 billion restaurant-stabilization grant program designed to help independent restaurants deal with the long-term structural challenges facing the industry due to COVID-19 and to ensure they can re-employ 11 million workers. Click here for more information on the hearing.

Maryland Uncovers $500 Million Coronavirus Unemployment Fraud

Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan announced yesterday that state officials had uncovered a massive fraudulent scheme involving 47,500 falsified unemployment insurance claims, adding up to more than $501 million, FoxNews.com reported. The scheme involved identity theft from previous security breaches and did suggest that any of the personal information submitted in the legitimate claims had been compromised in some way. “This criminal enterprise seeking to take advantage of a global pandemic to steal hundreds of millions, perhaps billions, of dollars from taxpayers is despicable,” said Hogan. The governor said the fraud was detected when state employees with the unemployment insurance website noticed an unusual uptick in the number of out-of-state claims being submitted, prompting an investigation and eventually notifying federal authorities. Maryland Labor Department Secretary Tiffany Robinson noted that the unusual activity occurred on the fourth of July.

Upcoming abiLIVE Webinars Look at Evolution of Consumer Bankruptcy Practice in the COVID-19 Era, Distressed Debt Market Trends and Evolving M&A Activity

Three upcoming abiLIVE webinars present experts looking at key issues to both consumer and business bankruptcy practice:

- Sponsored by ABI's Consumer Bankruptcy Committee, the "Evolution of Consumer Bankruptcy Practice in the COVID-19 Era" abiLIVE webinar tomorrow will look at what trends for consumer bankruptcy practice have emerged during the COVID-19 pandemic and what consumer practice will look like going forward. Featured speakers include John Crane of Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid & Crane LLC (Duluth, Ga.), Jenny L. Doling of J. Doling Law, PC (Palm Desert, CA) and Charissa Potts of Freedom Law PC (Eastpointe, Mich.) with chapter 13 trustee Margaret A. Burks (Cincinnati) serving as moderator. Register here for free.

- SRS Acquiom will sponsor a special abiLIVE roundtable on Distressed Debt Market Trends on July 21. The discussion on current trends will include how we got here, what we're seeing, and how today's market compares to other distressed times. Experts will also provide their viewpoints on how COVID-19 is turning lending markets upside-down, and provide tips on how best to respond to the challenging times. Speakers include Harrison Denman of White & Case LLP (New York), Thomas Finnigan, IV, of White Oak Financial, LLC (San Francisco), Samantha Good of Kirkland & Ellis LLP (San Francisco), Renee Kuhl of SRS Acquiom (Minneapolis), Eric McDonald of SRS Acquiom (New Orleans) and Paul St. Mauro Seaport Global Securities LLC (New York). Register here for free.

- Sponsored by Prosakuer, the "Evolving Landscape of Distressed M&A Activity" abiLIVE webinar on July 22 will highlight the current challenges facing insolvency professionals working on deals in the COVID-19 world and what to expect in the coming months. Featured speakers include Harold Bordwin of Keen-Summit (New York), Jeff Marwil of Proskauer (Chicago) and Rich Morgner of Jeffries (New York). Register here for free.

Sign up Today to Receive Rochelle’s Daily Wire by E-mail!
Have you signed up for Rochelle’s Daily Wire in the ABI Newsroom? Receive Bill Rochelle’s exclusive perspectives and analyses of important case decisions via e-mail!

Tap into Rochelle’s Daily Wire via the ABI Newsroom and Twitter!

BLOG EXCHANGE

New on ABI’s Bankruptcy Blog Exchange: CFPB Slaps Chicago Mortgage Lender with Redlining Lawsuit

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau alleges that Townstone Financial's CEO and president made statements on a radio show discouraging applicants living in Black neighborhoods from seeking home loans, according to a recent blog post.

To read more on this blog and all others on the ABI Blog Exchange, please click here.

 
© 2020 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314
 

Commentary: The Role of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in Addressing the Consequences of COVID19

ABI Bankruptcy Brief

April 30, 2020

 
ABI Bankruptcy Brief
 
 
 
NEWS AND ANALYSIS

Commentary: The Role of Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in Addressing the Consequences of COVID19*

Many businesses may require bankruptcy proceedings to assist in recovery from the COVID-19-induced recession, according to a commentary by Prof. Jay Westbrook in the CreditSlips Blog. In his view, the best legal approach to any chapter 11 reforms necessitated by the emerging economic crisis lies in building up from the Small Business Reorganization Act (SBRA) to cover more small and medium enterprises (SMEs), rather than trying to adjust the general provisions of chapter 11, the home of larger bankruptcies like General Motors and American Airlines. The database at the Business Bankruptcy Project shows that in 2018, more than half of the businesses that filed under chapter 11 in the Southern District of New York would have fallen under the temporary SBRA cap of $7.5 million. Most immediately, the recently voted funds for small businesses must be available in bankruptcy reorganization cases, according to Prof. Westbrook, and we must remove any barrier to using them in that way. Bankruptcy cannot help unless it can be used in connection with rescue funding, according to the commentary.



*The views expressed in this commentary are from the author/publication cited, are meant for informative purposes only, and are not an official position of ABI.
 

Weekly Jobless Claims Hit 3.84 Million, Topping 30 Million over the Last 6 Weeks

The Labor Department reported today that first-time filings for unemployment insurance hit 3.84 million last week as the wave of economic pain continues, CNBC.com reported. Jobless claims for the week ended April 25 came in at the lowest level since March 21, but bring the rolling six-week total to 30.3 million as part of the worst employment crisis in U.S. history. Claims hit a record 6.87 million for the week of March 28 and have declined each week since then. Last week’s initially reported figure was revised up by 15,000 to 4.4 million, meaning that the most recent total is a decrease of 603,000. Continuing claims rose to just shy of 18 million, a rise of 2.2 million from the previous week. The four-week moving average, which smooths volatility, jumped to 13.3 million, an increase of 3.7 million from the previous week’s average.



 

Federal Reserve to Offer ‘Main Street Loans’ for Businesses with Up to 15,000 Employees

The Federal Reserve is planning to launch its emergency lending program for small and medium-size businesses soon, and even more businesses will be able to qualify than originally planned, the Washington Post reported. The Fed said today that businesses with up to 15,000 employees and $5 billion in annual revenue can apply, a much higher threshold than the initially announced caps of 10,000 employees and $2.5 billion in revenue. Lobbyists and some lawmakers had urged the Fed to open the loans up to more companies, especially distressed oil and gas firms. Companies should soon be able to go to their banks to obtain one of these loans, but the program is not up and running yet. Fed Chair Jerome H. Powell said yesterday that he expected the “Main Street Lending Program” to be operational “fairly quickly.” “These are not grants. These are loans,” Powell emphasized yesterday. Most small businesses with less than 500 employees have been encouraged to seek a Small Business Administration loan, known as the Paycheck Protection Program, because that can be forgiven if the small business uses most of the money to rehire and pay employees. The Fed’s program is designed to target midsize companies and businesses that need money for more than just payroll expenses. The minimum loan size is $500,000, and companies will have up to four years to pay the money back. Most of the loans are capped at $25 million, but the Fed created an additional option to obtain a loan of up to $200 million. The interest rate on the loans will be about 3.4 percent, as it is set three percentage points above the LIBOR, a global benchmark interest rate. By contrast, the Small Business Administration’s PPP loans were set at a much lower interest rate of 1 percent.

Commentary: Is This a Liquidity Crisis or a Solvency Crisis? It Matters to the Fed*

Whether the economy is facing a liquidity crisis or a solvency crisis is a distinction that will determine how important the Federal Reserve is to returning the economy to health, according to a Wall Street Journal commentary. In a liquidity crisis, otherwise-healthy firms collapse because they can’t access credit. The Fed can resolve such a crisis because it can print and lend unlimited amounts of money. In a solvency crisis, companies can’t survive no matter how much they can borrow; they need more revenue. The Fed can’t solve that. Fed Chairman Jerome Powell underlined the distinction yesterday. The central bank had directed aid to sectors “where we have never been before and … quite aggressively,” he said at a news conference after the central bank’s policy meeting. “Nonetheless, these are lending powers. We can’t lend to insolvent companies. We can’t make grants.” By preventing illiquid companies from going bankrupt, the market seems to believe that the Fed has set the stage for a brisk economic recovery once the coronavirus pandemic eases. Investors may have conferred more power on the Fed than the Fed believes it has. Mr. Powell urged Congress to appropriate more money to aid potentially insolvent firms and the unemployed. “This is the time to use the great fiscal power of the United States to do what we can to support the economy,” he said. A much bigger challenge looms: the many companies that were profitable before the pandemic and should be again when the pandemic has passed, but that may not survive that long. Providing them with cash should pay economic dividends in terms of protecting jobs and incomes, but such a move is complicated by the question of whether the firms are illiquid or insolvent. (Subscription required.)



*The views expressed in this commentary are from the author/publication cited, are meant for informative purposes only, and are not an official position of ABI.
 

Analysis: The Devil's in the Details for Junk Debt Investors Facing Coronavirus Defaults

Before the coronavirus, investors hungry for returns piled into risky corporate loans and bonds with precious little protection for creditors. Now they’re frantically scouring the terms to see just what firms can get away with to survive the fallout, according to a Reuters analysis. At the same time, firms starved of cash and funds thinking about lending to them are also poring over the fine print to see what room they have to shift assets away from other creditors, pay dividends or borrow more while staving off default. With the coronavirus pandemic threatening to trigger a surge in corporate loan defaults, borrowers and investors in so-called covenant-lite loans and high-yield bonds with weak protections for creditors are taking stock fast. Over the past decade, the leveraged-loan market has trebled to about $1.4 trillion. Whereas only 15 percent of loans in 2010 were deemed covenant-lite, now more than 80 percent lack clauses that might trigger warnings about a company’s finances or stop it from stripping out assets, according to S&P Global Market Intelligence.

Commentary: Borrower Beware: CARES Loans Carry a Steep Cost*

Questions are already arising about whether the federal dollars flooding the U.S. economy during the COVID-19 crisis are reaching the intended recipients, and rightly so, when trillions in taxpayer dollars are at stake. But it should make businesses think twice before they take federal money, according to a Wall Street Journal commentary. Clearly, there should be a financial lifeline for America’s hundreds of thousands of small businesses and 30 million unemployed. When the government orders “nonessential” business to close, it’s only reasonable that it should compensate them. But borrower beware! Businesses with flexibility should seriously consider to what extent accepting the terms of federal loans or other support may be a Faustian bargain. The ultimate cost may dramatically outweigh the temporary gain. Through the congressional oversight commission established under the CARES Act, the new Special Inspector General for Pandemic Recovery, and numerous other freshly funded inspectors general, the groundwork has already been laid for aggressive investigation and review of which businesses received — and how they spent — federal emergency funds. Read more. (Subscription required.)



*The views expressed in this commentary are from the author/publication cited, are meant for informative purposes only, and are not an official position of ABI.

The abiLIVE panel discussion held on April 6, featuring former House Speaker John A. Boehner, discussed oversight of funds appropriated by the CARES Act and provided a warning to firms about being transparent and acting in good faith in accepting the funds. Access a replay here.

Coronavirus Oversight Panel Staffs Up

The committee of inspectors general investigating the coronavirus pandemic response — which lost its chair earlier this month — named its top staffer and launched a website to help the public track its investigations, CNN.com reported. The Pandemic Response Accountability Committee, which was created by Congress in the CARES Act, selected former inspector general Robert Westbrooks to be executive director of the committee, which will examine the coronavirus outbreak response and the trillions being spent to prop up small businesses and help corporations. The PRAC, composed of 21 members from offices of inspectors general across the federal government, is intended to help coordinate their investigations into various elements of the outbreak response. But the committee has gotten off to a rocky start after naming then-acting Pentagon Inspector General Glenn Fine as chairman of the committee. A week later, Trump replaced Fine as head of the Defense Department inspector general office — which in turn made him ineligible to serve on the coronavirus panel, let alone lead it. In addition to the inspectors general committee, the CARES Act created a new special inspector general for pandemic recovery and a five-member Congressional Oversight Commission, and provided an influx of funding to nonpartisan congressional watchdog the Government Accountability Office. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has also created her own new select subcommittee in the House to investigate the coronavirus response.



In related news, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) yesterday filled out the Democratic roster on a special committee overseeing coronavirus relief spending, naming six new members to the newly created panel, including some of President Trump’s harshest congressional critics, The Hill reported. The panel, created by a party-line vote last week, will be led by Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.), the Democratic whip. In a letter to Democrats Wednesday, Pelosi named six additional members: Reps. Maxine Waters (Calif.), Carolyn Maloney (N.Y.), Nydia Velázquez (N.Y.), Bill Foster (Ill.), Jamie Raskin (Md.) and Andy Kim (N.J.). Democrats are billing the panel as a commonsense safeguard to ensure that the historic levels of emergency funding — money designed to prop up businesses, workers, families and medical providers most affected by the coronavirus fallout — aren’t frittered away by fraud and abuse. Republican leaders in Congress and the White House have said that the Clyburn committee is both redundant and politically motivated. They’re accusing Democrats of establishing the panel merely to embarrass Trump in the months leading up to November’s elections.

New ABI Website Supplies Bankruptcy Professionals with Key Resources to Help Navigate the Financial Crisis Resulting from the COVID-19 Pandemic

ABI this week launched its new COVID-19 Resources website for bankruptcy professionals and the public to access essential information and analysis regarding the financial distress being inflicted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The site features exclusive ABI content on the crisis, recommended member analysis, industry sector news, charts and more. Click here to access the site, and be sure to bookmark the page so you can easily check back for regular updates!

Upcoming abiLIVE Webinars to Examine Litigation Finance, Nuts and Bolts of Subchapter V for Small Businesses and Chapter 12 Update

ABI will host a number of abiLIVE webinars over the next two weeks looking at key issues for practitioners amid the economic downturn due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Expert panels include:

• The "Litigation Finance: Lessons from the Last Financial Crisis for the COVID-19 Downturn" webinar on May 6 will feature Eric Fisher of Binder & Schwartz (New York), Marc Kirschner of Goldin Associates, LLC (New York), Cathy Reece of Fennemore Craig PC (Phoenix, Ariz.) and Emily Slater of Burford Capital (New York). Click here to register for free.

• Sponsored by ABI's Consumer Bankruptcy Committee, the "Understanding the Nuts and Bolts of ‘New’ Subchapter V Small Business Chapter 11" webinar on May 7 will feature Committee co-chair Jon Lieberman of Sottile & Barile (Loveland, Ohio) moderating a panel including James B. Bailey of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP (Birmingham, Ala.), Bankruptcy Judge Paul W. Bonapfel (N.D. Ga.; Atlanta) and Judith Greenstone Miller of Jaffe Raitt Heuer & Weiss, P.C. (Southfield, MI). Click here to register for free.

• The "Update Your Chapter 12 Skills" webinar on May 20 will be hosted by ABI's Legislation Committee and feature Bankruptcy Judge Robert L. Jones (N.D. Tex.; Lubbock), Joseph A. Peiffer of AG & Business Legal Strategies (Cedar Rapids, Iowa) and Ronda J. Winnecour, Office of the Chapter 13 Trustee (Pittsburgh). Click here to register for free.

Sign up Today to Receive Rochelle’s Daily Wire by E-mail!
Have you signed up for Rochelle’s Daily Wire in the ABI Newsroom? Receive Bill Rochelle’s exclusive perspectives and analyses of important case decisions via e-mail!

Tap into Rochelle’s Daily Wire via the ABI Newsroom and Twitter!

BLOG EXCHANGE

New on ABI’s Bankruptcy Blog Exchange: SBA and U.S. Treasury Announce Full “Review” of Businesses Receiving PPP Loans Greater than $2 Million

Treasury Secretary Steven T. Mnuchin and U.S. Small Business Administration administrator Jovita Carranza issued a joint statement on April 28 stating that a review will be conducted for businesses seeking loan forgiveness for loans in excess of $2 million under the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), as enacted under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), according to a recent blog post.

To read more on this blog and all others on the ABI Blog Exchange, please click here.

 
© 2020 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314
 

U.S. Jobless Claims Top 5.2 Million, Erasing Decade of Job Gains

ABI Bankruptcy Brief

April 16, 2020

 
ABI Bankruptcy Brief
 
 
 
NEWS AND ANALYSIS

U.S. Jobless Claims Top 5.2 Million, Erasing Decade of Job Gains

More than 5 million Americans filed for unemployment benefits last week, bringing the total in the month since the coronavirus pandemic throttled the U.S. economy to 22 million and effectively erasing a decade of job creation, Bloomberg News reported. Initial jobless claims of 5.25 million in the week ended April 11 followed 6.62 million the prior week, according to Labor Department figures today. The four-week sum compares with roughly 21.5 million jobs added during the expansion that began in mid-2009. The latest figures suggest an unemployment rate currently around at least 17% -- far above the 10% reached in the wake of the recession that ended in 2009 -- in a sign that the effects of shutdowns have spread well beyond an initial wave of restaurants, hotels and other businesses. Another reason for elevated claims is that Americans are getting through on outdated or overwhelmed systems after previously being stymied. Continuing claims, or the total number of Americans receiving unemployment benefits, jumped by 4.53 million to a record 12 million in the week ended April 4. Those figures are reported with a one-week lag.

Some Banks Keep Customers’ Stimulus Checks if Accounts Are Overdrawn

For some struggling Americans, the arrival of a deposit from the Treasury Department to help with basic expenses like rent and groceries during the coronavirus crisis was something to count on — until their financial institutions got in the way, the New York Times reported. The phenomenon is swiftly becoming a political issue, with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin fielding calls from senators urging him to ensure that CARES Act relief money isn’t garnished. Banks are legally allowed to withhold funds that go into accounts that have negative balances, and no specific provision in the CARES Act, the $2 trillion relief package that authorized the stimulus payments, prevents banks from taking customers’ stimulus money to cover debts. The government checks are meant to cushion the pandemic’s financial blow to some of the hardest-hit Americans. Anyone who earns up to $75,000 in adjusted gross annual income and has a Social Security number will receive $1,200. Married couples who file joint tax returns will receive $2,400 if their adjusted gross income is under $150,000. The amount declines for those who make more. Several politicians are calling for banks to stop garnishing stimulus payments. On Wednesday, Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) implored the head of a bank trade group to tell its members to halt the practice. “For weeks, we have pressed the Treasury Department to exercise its authority and ensure that Americans receive the full amount of their stimulus payments,” the senators wrote in a letter to Rob Nichols, the chief executive of the American Bankers Association. “While Treasury has refused to follow congressional intent, that does not give banks license to steal the stimulus payments from their customers.” By contrast, the CARES Act specifically prohibits garnishing stimulus money for state or federal debts, except for court-mandated child support.



 

Despite Federal Ban, Landlords Are Still Moving to Evict People During the Pandemic

Landlords in at least four states have violated the eviction ban passed by Congress last month, a review of records shows, moving to throw more than 100 people out of their homes, ProPublica.org reported. In an effort to help renters amid the coronavirus pandemic and skyrocketing unemployment, the March 27 CARES Act banned eviction filings for all federally backed rental units nationwide, more than a quarter of the total. But ProPublica found building owners who are simply not following the law, with no apparent consequence, filing to evict tenants from properties in Georgia, Oklahoma, Texas and Florida. The scores of cases ProPublica found represent only a small slice of the true total because there’s no nationwide — or, in many cases, even statewide — database of eviction filings. Four landlords said they were reversing eviction filings after being contacted by ProPublica and informed the filings were illegal. National real estate trade groups, however, are already lobbying to limit the scope of the ban. The recent eviction filings underscore Congress’s failure to include an enforcement mechanism in the law, as well as the complexity of the ban, which only applies to certain categories of properties. “There’s nothing in the bill that seems to create a clear penalty for violating the new law,” said Dan Immergluck, an urban studies professor at Georgia State University in Atlanta. He added it’s not clear that landlords even know about the ban.


 

‘Pretty Catastrophic’ Month for Retailers, Now in a Race to Survive

Retail sales plunged in March, offering a grim snapshot of the coronavirus outbreak’s effect on consumer spending, as businesses shuttered from coast to coast and wary shoppers restricted their spending, the New York Times reported. Total sales, which include retail purchases in stores and online as well as money spent at bars and restaurants, fell 8.7 percent from the previous month, the Commerce Department said Wednesday. The decline was by far the largest in the nearly three decades the government has tracked the data. Even that bleak figure doesn’t capture the full impact of the sudden economic freeze on the retail industry. Most states didn’t shut down nonessential businesses until late March or early April, meaning data for the current month could be worse still. When demand does rebound, it might come too late for some retailers, many of which were struggling even before the pandemic because of changes in mall traffic and a long-term shift to online sales. “Pent-up demand is what drives recoveries, and the good news there is we will come out of this with some degree of pent-up demand,” said Ellen Zentner, chief U.S. economist for Morgan Stanley. She added, however, that there are “a lot of caveats.” Apparel retailers, in particular, seem to be preparing for a substantial amount of destroyed demand. Deborah Weinswig, founder of Coresight Research, an advisory and research firm that specializes in retail and technology, said she had spoken with retailers who were preparing for holiday sales to be 40 percent lower than last year.

Measures to Control Coronavirus Weigh on U.S. Homebuilding

U.S. homebuilding fell by the most in 36 years in March amid a broad decline in activity, offering further evidence that the economy is buckling under the weight of drastic measures to control the spread of the novel coronavirus, Reuters reported. Housing starts plunged 22.3% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.216 million units last month, the Commerce Department said on Thursday. That was the largest monthly decline in starts since March 1984. Data for February was revised downward to show homebuilding decreasing to a pace of 1.564 million units rather than the 1.599 million units previously reported. Homebuilding declined in all four regions last month.

Commentary: Rethinking the World Economy as We Know It

As the world economy is an infinitely complicated web of interconnections, it shows what is unnerving about the economic calamity accompanying the spread of the novel coronavirus. In the years ahead, we will learn what happens when that web is torn apart, when millions of those links are destroyed all at once, according to a commentary in the New York Times. And it opens the possibility of a global economy completely different from the one that has prevailed in recent decades. It would be foolish, amid such uncertainty, to make overly confident predictions about how the world economic order will look in five years, or even in five months, according to the commentary. But one lesson of these episodes of economic tumult is that those surprising ripple effects tend to result from longstanding unaddressed frailties. One obvious candidate is globalization, in which companies can move production wherever it’s most efficient, people can hop on a plane and go nearly anywhere, and money can flow to wherever it will be put to its highest use. The idea of a world economy with the United States at its center was already falling apart, between the rise of China and America’s own turn toward nationalism. “There will be a rethink of how much any country wants to be reliant on any other country,” said Elizabeth Economy, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. “I don’t think fundamentally this is the end of globalization. But this does accelerate the type of thinking that has been going on in the Trump administration, that there are critical technologies, critical resources, reserve manufacturing capacity that we want here in the U.S. in case of crisis.” Even before the coronavirus hit, the limits of globalization were becoming clearer. Trade as a share of global GDP peaked in 2008 and has trended lower ever since. The election of President Trump and the onset of a trade war with China had already made multinational companies start to rethink their operations. “I think companies are actively talking about resilience,” said Susan Lund, a partner at McKinsey who studies global interconnectedness. “To what extent would companies be willing to sacrifice quarter-to-quarter efficiency for resilience over the long term, whether that’s natural disasters, the climate crisis, pandemics or other shocks?”

ABI's GlobalInsolvency Webpage Features Global Responses to Limit the Economic Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic

Learn about the ongoing measures being taken around the world to limit the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. GlobalInsolvency members have compiled insights into fiscal, monetary & macro financial, health policy and global cooperation/international assistance measures undertaken to date. Click here to view the COVID-19 Global Response page.

abiLIVE Webinar on April 29 to Examine Trading in the Secondary Markets in the Current Environment

Amid the financial crisis due to the COVID-19 coronavirus, when is a trade (whether it is bank debt, bond debt or bankruptcy trade claim) a trade? When are they considered broken, despite industry standards and practices? Listen to a panel of experts explore the answers to these questions and more on an abiLIVE webinar hosted by ABI's Claim's Trading Committee on April 29. Register for FREE!
 

Replays Available for Recent abiLIVE Webinars on the CARES Act, SBRA, Consumer Relief and Preferences

ABI hosted a series of webinars last week looking at the "Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act" (CARES Act) and the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019, which went into effect on Feb. 19. The programs featured expert speakers looking at how the laws created greater access to financial relief for consumers and small businesses seeking bankruptcy. Former House Speaker John A. Boehner joined a panel to examine tools to navigate the financial crisis related to COVID-19. Be sure to use your ABI member login on the http://cle.abi.org site to access the replay and materials.
 
"The Small Business Reorganization Act: How It Helps in Today’s Health & Economic Crisis"
Panelists: Bankruptcy Judge Madeleine C. Wanslee (D. Ariz., Phoenix), Robert J. Keach of Bernstein Shur (Portland, Maine) and Attorney Allan D. NewDelman (Phoenix), moderated by ABI Editor-at-Large Bill Rochelle.
Click here for the video and materials.
 
"Tools to Navigate the Financial Crisis Related to COVID-19"
Panelists: Former U.S. House Speaker John A. Boehner of  Squire Patton Boggs (Washington, D.C.), Karol Denniston of Squire Patton Boggs (San Francisco), Michael C. Eisenband of FTI Consulting (New York), Brian Kennedy of FTI Consulting (Washington, D.C.) and Ed J. Newberry of Squire Patton Boggs (Washington, D.C.), moderated by Stephen Lerner of Squire Patton Boggs (Cincinnati, Ohio).
Click here for the video and materials.
 
"The Consumer Provisions of the CARES ACT, and Local Court Responses to the Pandemic"
Speakers: Bankruptcy Judge Tracey N. Wise (E.D. Ky.; Lexington), Attorney Eric Goering (Cincinnati), Prof. Robert M. Lawless of the University of Illinois (Champaign, Ill.) and Reporter for the ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy, and Michael J. McCormick of McCalla Raymer (Atlanta), moderated by David P. Leibowitz of Lakelaw (Chicago).
Click here for the video and materials.
 
"Preference Update: SBRA’s Due Diligence Requirement" 
Speakers: Timothy J. McKeon of Mintz Levin (Boston), Bankruptcy Judge Jerrold N. Poslusny (D. N.J.; Camden), Shane G. Ramsey of Nelson Mullins (Nashville, Tenn.) and Bethany J. Rubis of ASK LLP (Saint Paul, Minn.).
Click here for the video and materials.
 

Sign up Today to Receive Rochelle’s Daily Wire by E-mail!
Have you signed up for Rochelle’s Daily Wire in the ABI Newsroom? Receive Bill Rochelle’s exclusive perspectives and analyses of important case decisions via e-mail!

Tap into Rochelle’s Daily Wire via the ABI Newsroom and Twitter!

BLOG EXCHANGE

New on ABI’s Bankruptcy Blog Exchange: CFPB Finalizes HMDA Rule that Gives Reg Relief to Banks

The move is part of an effort by CFPB Director Kathy Kraninger to help smaller lenders by significantly raising loan thresholds for collecting and reporting mortgage data, according to a recent blog post.

To read more on this blog and all others on the ABI Blog Exchange, please click here.

 
© 2020 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314
 

4.4 Million Sought Unemployment Benefits Last Week

ABI Bankruptcy Brief

April 23, 2020

 
ABI Bankruptcy Brief
 
 
 
NEWS AND ANALYSIS

4.4 Million Sought Unemployment Benefits Last Week

More than 4.4 million Americans filed for unemployment benefits last week, according to the Labor Department, a signal the tidal wave of job losses continues to grow during the coronavirus pandemic, the Washington Post reported. It’s the fifth straight week that job losses were measured in the millions. From March 15 to April 18, 26.5 million people have probably been laid off or furloughed. The number of jobs lost in that brief span effectively erased all jobs created after the 2008 financial crisis. Jobless figures on this scale haven’t been seen since the Great Depression. The new weekly total comes on top of 22 million Americans who had sought benefits in previous weeks, a volume that has overwhelmed state systems for processing unemployment claims. Economists estimate the national unemployment rate sits between 15 and 20 percent, much higher than it was during the Great Recession in 2008 and 2009. The unemployment rate at the peak of the Great Depression was about 25 percent.

In related news, as millions file claims, many are poised to receive more money than they would have typically earned in their jobs, thanks to the additional $600 a week set aside in the federal stimulus package for the unemployed, the New York Times reported. That calculation is based on an analysis of the so-called replacement rate, which is the share of a worker’s wages that is replaced by unemployment benefits. Replacement rates for each state are determined by dividing the average unemployment payment by the average 40-hour-a-week salary of those who receive unemployment benefits. Ernie Tedeschi, a former Treasury Department official and an economist at Evercore ISI Research, combined the new stimulus relief with each state’s average unemployment payment at the end of 2019 to estimate how much their replacement rates would increase. The Massachusetts replacement rate will increase the smallest amount, he found, though it still doubles. Mississippi will have an 88 percentage point jump, meaning workers there earning an average wage will make roughly $130 more in benefits. These estimates, which reflect what tens of thousands of people around the country may now receive, come with caveats. As large portions of the economy remain closed because of the outbreak, rendering more than 26 million people without jobs in a matter of weeks, no one knows for sure how wages and benefits for those receiving unemployment might change as more people enter the ranks. A provision of the stimulus package, for example, allows part-time and self-employed workers who would normally not qualify for unemployment to receive benefits. That will alter the makeup of the typical pool of people filing claims, not to mention the average benefit paid out.

Commentary: Congress Will Need More than the CARES Act to Help Consumers Weather the COVID-19 Financial Crisis

The financial support for Americans within the CARES Act will unfortunately prove to be shockingly minimal, according to a recent essay by Profs. Pamela Foohey, Dalié Jiménez and Christopher K. Odinet. The direct payments represent a fraction of the average American households’ monthly budget. It also quickly became apparent that the payments were unlikely to reach most people within any sort of useful time frame, and that once they did, they could be garnished immediately by debt collectors and even banks themselves. The unemployment benefits, while providing people with more money over several months, required that people be laid off and similarly were unlikely to reach people quickly enough to be effective. People’s wages decreased at the exact time they were spending more money to stock up on supplies. The CARES Act promised to send people small checks and augment unemployment benefits. Americans very soon began to discover that these promises would do little to help them survive the coming months of financial and social upheaval. It has also become quickly apparent to lawmakers that Congress will need to pass at least one additional stimulus package. And with projections that the pandemic could last for 12 to 18 months, it seems that Congress may have several more opportunities to craft legislation that actually will help American families survive the pandemic. This legislation must provide people with true funding to stay current with their minimum necessary expenses as these expenses are incurred. If done right, helping individuals will cost the government more than $2 trillion next time, and the time after that, and possibly the time after that. And, if done right, it will be worth every penny, according to the essay.



 

Getting a Mortgage-Payment Break Isn’t the Boon Many Expected

A government effort to give Americans a break on their mortgage payments during the coronavirus pandemic hasn’t provided the relief many homeowners were hoping for, the Wall Street Journal reported. The stimulus package that Congress passed in March allows homeowners with federally backed loans to suspend monthly payments for up to a year without penalty if they face financial hardship. But the law doesn’t specify what happens after the so-called forbearance period ends. Many borrowers say they are being told they will have to make lump-sum “balloon” payments. The situation is causing extra anxiety for U.S. households dealing with job losses and the struggles of life under lockdown. If mortgage servicers follow through with demands for lump-sum payments, borrowers could be pushed into default, damaging their creditworthiness and compounding the financial pain inflicted by the downturn. The coronavirus relief package passed by Congress created no mechanism to test whether homeowners face financial hardship and left servicers on the hook for payments skipped by borrowers during the forbearance period.


 

U.S. Treasury Says It Will Be Hard for Public Companies to Qualify for Coronavirus Relief Loans

A highly valued public company will have a hard time getting a coronavirus relief loan, the U.S. Treasury said today, just as Congress was poised to approve a new round of funding for the loans known as the Paycheck Protection Program, Reuters reported. “It is unlikely that a public company with substantial market value and access to capital markets will be able to make the required certification in good faith,” the Treasury said in an updated list of Frequently Asked Questions on the program. Public outcry has erupted over major chain restaurants being able to take out the forgivable loans in the first round of lending this month. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin warned yesterday that companies that received the rescue money intended for small businesses could be investigated. He told Fox Business Network it was “questionable” whether larger firms had qualified for loans based on a self-certification step in the application process. The FAQ made it clear that the Treasury is looking hard at the step in which a small business “must certify in good faith that their PPP loan request is necessary.” “Specifically, before submitting a PPP application, all borrowers should review carefully the required certification that ‘current economic uncertainty makes this loan request necessary to support the ongoing operations of the applicant,’” it said. The U.S. Senate has approved another $310 billion in funding for the loans, with the House of Representatives set to pass it later today.

Global Economy Hit by Record Collapse of Business Activity

Business activity in the U.S., Europe and Japan collapsed in April as governments tightened restrictions on movement and social interaction aimed at limiting the spread of the coronavirus, according to surveys of purchasing managers, the Wall Street Journal reported. The surveys, released today, suggest that governments have effectively closed parts of the economy where face-to-face interaction is unavoidable—such as restaurants and barbers—and activity has tumbled in parts of the economy less directly affected. The drop in services-sector activity is unprecedented in the history of the surveys, even in the wake of the global financial crisis. Manufacturing activity is also contracting, though not quite as severely. According to data firm IHS Markit, the composite Purchasing Managers Index for the U.S. — a measure of activity in the private sector — fell to 27.4 in April from 40.9 in March. A reading below 50.0 indicates that activity has fallen, and the lower the figure, the larger the fall. The April reading was the lowest in data dating back to October 2009.

The Death of the Department Store: ‘Very Few Are Likely to Survive’

American department stores, once all-powerful shopping meccas that anchored malls and Main Streets across the country, have been dealt blow after blow in the past decade. J.C. Penney and Sears were upended by hedge funds. Macy’s has been closing stores and cutting corporate staff. Barneys New York filed for bankruptcy last year. But nothing compares to the shock the weakened industry has taken from the coronavirus pandemic. Sales of clothing and accessories fell by more than half in March, a trend that is expected to only get worse in April. The entire executive team at Lord & Taylor was let go this month. Nordstrom has canceled orders and put off paying its vendors. The Neiman Marcus Group, the most glittering of the American department store chains, is expected to declare bankruptcy in the coming days, the first major retailer to be felled during the current crisis. “The department stores, which have been failing slowly for a very long time, really don’t get over this,” said Mark A. Cohen, the director of retail studies at Columbia University’s Business School. At a time when retailers should be putting in orders for the all-important holiday shopping season, stores are furloughing tens of thousands of corporate and store employees, hoarding cash and desperately planning how to survive this crisis. The specter of mass default is being discussed not just behind closed doors but in analysts’ future models. Whether or not that happens, no one doubts that the upheaval caused by the pandemic will permanently alter both the retail landscape and the relationships of brands with the stores that sell them.

Hard-Hit Restaurants, Gyms and Other Businesses Are Battling Insurers over COVID-19 Shutdown

A multibillion-dollar standoff between the nation’s leading insurers and the restaurants, hotels, gyms and theaters that purchase their policies has spilled into some of the most powerful corridors of Congress, as both sides clash over who should foot the sky-high costs of the coronavirus outbreak, the Washington Post reported. The battle hinges on whether insurance providers should have to pay claims to companies that have shuttered unexpectedly as a result of the deadly pandemic. The dispute has attracted the attention of President Trump, triggered lawsuits in courtrooms nationwide and touched off a massive lobbying blitz on Capitol Hill, where some insurers say the federal government instead should be the one providing financial help to those that need it most. The industry’s powerful lobbyists, led by the American Property Casualty Insurance Association (APCIA), say “business interruption” policies never were intended to cover contagions. Even if they had been, the estimated claims just from small businesses during the coronavirus pandemic could total more than $430 billion a month, threatening to create a “solvency event” for the industry, said David A. Sampson, the group’s chief executive. But business executives who have paid their premiums for years say they have been misled — and now face dire financial straits without the aid they believe they were promised. Some have sought federal aid in response: Prominent restaurateurs including Wolfgang Puck, for example, have raised the issue directly with Trump in recent days. The problem has taken on even greater urgency because of growing confusion about who qualifies for federal coronavirus aid, given changing government guidelines — and fast-dwindling funds.

Businesses Strive to Reopen from Coronavirus Shutdown

As America’s attention turns to reopening its economy, many businesses are deploying a range of tactics to attempt to shield their workforces from the coronavirus. For the most part, they are making it up as they go, the Wall Street Journal reported. With no single standard or clear-cut road map, safety procedures and implementation vary widely, particularly on how to handle confirmed COVID-19 cases in the workplace. Pepsi-Cola bottling plants in New York are giving factory workers surgical masks and checking their temperatures at the door. A rival Coca-Cola bottler has given employees thermometers to monitor themselves and red bandannas as face covers at work. Testing employees for the virus before they come to work has also emerged as a potential solution for businesses looking to better track the outbreak. But executives say that there are still many hurdles to widespread deployment, including whether enough tests can be secured and workers will agree to take them. Businesses that never closed their facilities because they were deemed essential are on the forefront of these ad hoc efforts — with vastly mixed results and constant changes. Others, such as many major car makers, plan to reopen factories in coming weeks. The patchwork approach to safety is creating tensions with unions and debate over whether some companies are doing enough to protect workers. Some employees in recent weeks have walked off the job, saying their workplaces were putting them at risk. (Subscription required.)

ABI's GlobalInsolvency Webpage Features Global Responses to Limit the Economic Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic

Learn about the ongoing measures being taken around the world to limit the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. GlobalInsolvency members have compiled insights into fiscal, monetary & macro financial, health policy and global cooperation/international assistance measures undertaken to date. Click here to view the COVID-19 Global Response page.

Upcoming abiLIVE Webinars Examine Trading in the Secondary Markets, Litigation Finance and the Nuts and Bolts of Subchapter V for Small Businesses

ABI will host a number of abiLIVE webinars over the next two weeks looking at key issues for practitioners amid the economic downturn due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Expert panels include:

• Hosted by the ABI Claims Trading Committee, "Trading in the Secondary Credit Markets: When Am I Bound?" on April 29 features attorney Richard Corbi (New York) moderating a panel including David Daniels of Richards Kibbe Orbe (Washington, D.C.), Jennifer Pastarnack of Sullivan and Worcester (New York) and Amanda Segal of Katten (New York). Click here to register for free.

• The "Litigation Finance: Lessons from the Last Financial Crisis for the COVID-19 Downturn" webinar on May 6 will feature Eric Fisher of Binder & Schwartz (New York), Marc Kirschner of Goldin Associates, LLC (New York), Cathy Reece of Fennemore Craig PC (Phoenix, Ariz.) and Emily Slater of Burford Capital (New York). Click here to register for free.

• Sponsored by ABI's Consumer Bankruptcy Committee, the "Understanding the Nuts and Bolts of ‘New’ Subchapter V Small Business Chapter 11" webinar on May 7 will feature Committee co-chair Jon Lieberman of Sottile & Barile (Loveland, Ohio) moderating a panel including James B. Bailey of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP (Birmingham, Ala.), Bankruptcy Judge Paul W. Bonapfel (N.D. Ga.; Atlanta) and Judith Greenstone Miller of Jaffe Raitt Heuer & Weiss, P.C. (Southfield, MI). Click here to register for free.

• The "Update Your Chapter 12 Skills" webinar on May 20 will be hosted by ABI's Legislation Committee and feature Bankruptcy Judge Robert L. Jones (N.D. Tex.; Lubbock), Joseph A. Peiffer of AG & Business Legal Strategies (Cedar Rapids, Iowa) and Ronda J. Winnecour, Office of the Chapter 13 Trustee (Pittsburgh). Click here to register for free.

Sign up Today to Receive Rochelle’s Daily Wire by E-mail!
Have you signed up for Rochelle’s Daily Wire in the ABI Newsroom? Receive Bill Rochelle’s exclusive perspectives and analyses of important case decisions via e-mail!

Tap into Rochelle’s Daily Wire via the ABI Newsroom and Twitter!

BLOG EXCHANGE

New on ABI’s Bankruptcy Blog Exchange: State Attorneys General Urge FHFA, HUD to Expand Mortgage Payment Help

A bipartisan coalition of AGs said homeowners should be allowed to wait until the end of a loan term to make payments they skipped because of the coronavirus, according to a recent blog post.

To read more on this blog and all others on the ABI Blog Exchange, please click here.

 
© 2020 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314
 

Stores that Stocked Up on Debt Face a Harsh Holiday Reckoning

ABI Bankruptcy Brief

December 26, 2019

 
ABI Bankruptcy Brief
 
 
 
 
NEWS AND ANALYSIS

Stores that Stocked Up on Debt Face a Harsh Holiday Reckoning

Retailers are strapping in for the final days of their traditional do-or-die holiday shopping period. For some, that could be meant literally, as creditors and vendors decide which ones are still worth supporting in a field plagued by fewer shoppers, more online competition and too much debt, Bloomberg News reported. Some of the most familiar names — Forever 21 Inc., Barneys New York Inc. and Payless Inc. — have already collapsed into bankruptcy or liquidated this year. Among the survivors, fates have diverged, according to the restructuring experts at FTI Consulting Inc. “The retail sector is becoming more segmented between winners and losers,” Christa Hart, a senior managing director in FTI’s retail and consumer practice, said in an interview. “The ‘average’ has disappeared.” Merchants could use a strong finish after last year’s holiday season, when retailers wound up with their worst sales drop for December since 2008, according to U.S. Census Bureau data analyzed by FTI. This holiday season “will be disproportionately great for the strong players and disproportionately weak for the other ones,” Hart said. Some of the most vulnerable are the traditional department store chains. Moody’s Investors Service predicted in a November report that by the end of 2019, those retailers will have seen their operating income fall by more than 15 percent, despite heavy investing to improve inventory efficiency and to build their online capabilities. “It’s not 1985 anymore,” said Perry Mandarino, head of restructuring and co-head of investment banking at B. Riley FBR Inc. “People don’t need a one-stop shop where they can get everything from vacuum cleaners to jewelry.” 

Commentary: Trump’s New Plan to Make Student Loans Great Again

Student loan debt is the second-highest category of consumer debt after mortgages, averaging about $30,000 per borrower, according to a Forbes commentary. As first reported by the Wall Street Journal, President Trump has been meeting with advisers from the White House and U.S. Department of Education, led by Betsy DeVos, to create a plan to address student loans. During the 2016 presidential campaign, Trump proposed combining the existing student loan repayment plans into a single simpler repayment plan to help borrowers pay off student loans faster. Trump also proposed an income-based repayment plan that would cap monthly student loan payments at 12.5 percent of discretionary income and forgive remaining balances after 15 years. While Trump’s proposal raises the monthly payment cap from 10 percent to 12.5 percent of income, his proposal would forgive the remaining student loan balance five to 10 years sooner than the current income-driven repayment plans. Read the full commentary.



Student loan debt and bankruptcy was the first issue addressed by ABI’s Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy. To view the Commission’s recommendations on student loan debt and bankruptcy, please click here.

Be sure to also read “Game of Loans: Is Student Debt Forgiveness Coming?” in the December edition of the ABI Journal.

Also, the cost of rising tuition was a focus of an ABI Talk at the 2019 Winter Leadership Conference. Click here to watch the presentation by Inez Stepman of the Independent Women’s Forum (Washington, D.C.).

Survey: Private Capital Aimed at Distressed Businesses in 2020

With a majority of venture capital and private-equity firms expecting a recession to hit within two years, a massive volume of “dry powder” may be targeted at distressed businesses in 2020, CFO.com reported. In a survey of 100 VC fund managers and 100 PE fund managers by BDO, 40 percent and 39 percent of them, respectively, said they expected such businesses to be a “key driver” of deals next year. That represented an enormous departure from BDO’s previous survey of such investors a year ago, when only 1 percent of PE respondents anticipated distressed businesses being a key investment driver in 2019. BDO acknowledged that the current availability of distressed opportunities is “quite low.” However, the professional services firm noted, during the Great Recession private capital flocked to distressed-debt funds, which typically outperform other private investment strategies during an economic downturn. In the survey, 72 percent of private-equity respondents and 56 percent of venture capital respondents said they expected an economic downturn to arrive within two years. And 92 percent and 87 percent of them, respectively, anticipated a downturn within four years, which BDO characterized as “less than the length of most investment holding periods.”

Analysis: Congress Saves Coal Miner Pensions, but What About Others?

The $1.4 trillion spending bill passed by Congress last week quietly achieves what a parade of select committees and coordinating councils could not: the rescue of a dying pension fund that is the lifeblood of nearly 100,000 retired coal miners, the New York Times reported. For the first time in 45 years of federal pension law, taxpayer dollars will be used to bail out a fund for workers in the private sector. And now that there’s a precedent, it might not be the last. One coal company after another has gone bankrupt and stopped paying into the miners’ pension plan, but the retirees are still there. Its assets are dwindling, but the liabilities have stayed about the same. When the mine workers’ retiree health plan ran out of money in 1989, Congress arranged for new funding sources, including the Abandoned Mine Lands Reclamation Fund and, later, the Treasury. That precedent is now being followed for the miners’ pensions. Starting next year, the Treasury’s transfers to the Abandoned Mine Lands fund will rise to a maximum $750 million a year, and will help pay for pensions as well as retiree health care. This may prompt other unions to seek federal assistance for their plans, too.

Fed’s U-Turn on Assets Faces a Year-End Test

The Federal Reserve over the last three months has flooded money markets with hundreds of billions of dollars in cash to avoid a repeat of the volatility that roiled cash markets in September, the Wall Street Journal reported. The success of the moves — which reversed roughly half of the Fed’s shrinkage of its asset portfolio over the prior two years — will encounter a test around Dec. 31. That is when some financial institutions could face incentives from regulations to limit their lending, which could cause supply and demand imbalances for cash. Fed officials have said they believe reserves held at the Fed grew scarce enough in mid-September to put pressure on an obscure but important lending rate in the market for repos. “You can flood the markets with reserves, but are the reserves going to be redistributed to the corners of the markets that need it? That’s the big question,” said Ward McCarthy, chief financial economist at financial-services company Jefferies LLC. To prevent a squeeze from happening again, Fed officials have been buying short-term Treasury bills from financial institutions to put more reserves back into the financial system. They also have conducted daily injections of liquidity into markets. Altogether, those operations could add nearly $500 billion in net liquidity to markets around Dec. 31. (Subscription required.)

The Financial Lesson of 2008-09 that Most Investors Have Forgotten

If 2000-2009 was the Lost Decade for investors, 2010-2019 was the Decade of Forgetting, according to the Wall Street Journal. At year-end 2009, most investors — individuals and professionals alike — expected interest rates to rise, inflation to return, the dollar to weaken, commodities to boom and U.S. stocks to struggle. The giant investment firm Pacific Investment Management Co. and its then-influential co-founder Bill Gross were actively promoting their scenario of “the new normal,” which they described as “likely to be a significantly lower-returning world” for stocks and bonds alike for years to come. (Gross left Pimco in 2014 and retired from money management earlier this year.) Instead, over the ensuing 10 years, interest rates fell to historic lows, inflation all but vanished, the dollar strengthened, commodities languished, and U.S. stocks earned among the highest returns they have produced in any decade. Investors en masse pulled money out of active funds run by people trying to pick the best stocks or bonds, and poured cash into passive funds run by computers holding everything in a market index. Over the decade, according to Morningstar, investors withdrew more than $160 billion from all active funds combined, while adding more than $3.76 trillion to index funds. (Subscription required.)

Crisis Looms in Antibiotics as Drug Makers Go Bankrupt

At a time when germs are growing more resistant to common antibiotics, many companies that are developing new versions of the drugs are hemorrhaging money and going out of business, gravely undermining efforts to contain the spread of deadly, drug-resistant bacteria, the New York Times reported. Antibiotic start-ups like Achaogen and Aradigm have gone belly up in recent months, pharmaceutical behemoths like Novartis and Allergan have abandoned the sector, and many of the remaining American antibiotic companies are teetering toward insolvency. One of the biggest developers of antibiotics, Melinta Therapeutics, recently warned regulators it was running out of cash. Experts say the grim financial outlook for the few companies still committed to antibiotic research is driving away investors and threatening to strangle the development of new lifesaving drugs at a time when they are urgently needed. The problem is straightforward: The companies that have invested billions to develop the drugs have not found a way to make money selling them. Most antibiotics are prescribed for just days or weeks — unlike medicines for chronic conditions like diabetes or rheumatoid arthritis that have been blockbusters — and many hospitals have been unwilling to pay high prices for the new therapies. Political gridlock in Congress has thwarted legislative efforts to address the problem. The challenges facing antibiotic makers come at a time when many of the drugs designed to vanquish infections are becoming ineffective against bacteria and fungi, as overuse of the decades-old drugs has spurred them to develop defenses against the medicines.

U.S. Consumer Comfort Hits Nine-Week High on Economic Optimism

Confidence among U.S. consumers advanced to a nine-week high on greater optimism about the economy and brighter views of personal finances and the buying climate, Bloomberg News reported. Bloomberg’s index of consumer comfort increased to 62.3 in the week ended Dec. 22 from 61.1, according to data released today. A measure of confidence in the economy climbed to the highest since the end of July, while the personal finances gauge also was the strongest in nine weeks. Record stock prices, unemployment at a five-decade low and steady wage gains continue to lift spirits, putting the 2019 average sentiment level on track for the best since the 1999-2000 dot-com boom. Combined with elevated sentiment, this backdrop helps explain the economy’s resilience in the face of business-investment cutbacks and global demand concerns.

Sign up Today to Receive Rochelle’s Daily Wire by E-mail!
Have you signed up for Rochelle’s Daily Wire in the ABI Newsroom? Receive Bill Rochelle’s exclusive perspectives and analyses of important case decisions via e-mail!

Tap into Rochelle’s Daily Wire via the ABI Newsroom and Twitter!

PRESIDENTIAL PARTNERS

Bloomberg Law

Gavin / Solmonese

Thompson-Reuters
 

 

 
BLOG EXCHANGE

New on ABI’s Bankruptcy Blog Exchange: 600,000 Student Loan Borrowers Getting Nowhere
Student loan borrowers who plan to apply for Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF)  after 10 years of income-based payments are simply not getting their payments counted, according to a recent blog post.

To read more on this blog and all others on the ABI Blog Exchange, please click here.

 
© 2019 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314
 

Job Cuts from Bankruptcies Hit Highest Level Since 2005

ABI Bankruptcy Brief

January 2, 2020

 
ABI Bankruptcy Brief
 
 
 
 
NEWS AND ANALYSIS

Job Cuts from Bankruptcies Hit Highest Level Since 2005

Data by global outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas Inc. found that the number of job cuts announced in 2019 due to companies filing for bankruptcy protection hit the highest level in more than a decade, the Wall Street Journal reported. More than 62,100 job losses have been announced by U.S.-based employers in the past 12 months due to bankruptcy, according to the report. That number is higher than the annual totals for bankruptcy-related job cuts any year since 2005, when 74,200 were announced. Bankruptcy was one of the leading causes of job cuts, along with restructuring, trade difficulties and tariffs, in the past year, Challenger found. Employers said they were going to slash more than 592,500 jobs for various reasons, with the retail industry leading the way with nearly 77,500 cuts. About 10.5 percent of all job cuts announced through year-end 2019 were attributed to bankruptcies. In December alone, there were more than 5,500 job cuts due to bankruptcy, Challenger’s data show. There were more job cuts related to bankruptcy in 2019 than during the recession years. More than 62,100 jobs were affected due to bankruptcy in 2008, while about 50,900 were cut in 2009. (Subscription required.)

Financial Tug-of-War Emerges over Fire Victims' Settlement

A financial tug-of-war is emerging over the $13.5 billion that the nation's largest utility has agreed to pay to victims of recent California wildfires, as government agencies jockey for more than half the money to cover the costs of their response to the catastrophes, the Associated Press reported. Pacific Gas & Electric declared bankruptcy nearly a year ago as it faced about $36 billion in claims from people who lost family members, homes and businesses in devastating wildfires in 2017 and 2018. The utility acknowledged that its power lines ignited some of the fires. Those claims were settled as part of the $13.5 billion deal that PG&E reached last month with lawyers representing uninsured and underinsured victims. Meanwhile, insurers had been threatening to try to recover roughly $20 billion in policyholder claims that they believe they will end up paying for losses from those fires. PG&E settled with the insurers for $11 billion. PG&E must keep working on its broader bankruptcy exit plan to meet the approval of state regulators and a bankruptcy judge by June, as planned. In the meantime, the $13.5 billion settlement leaves open just how much would be used to compensate victims, their lawyers, and federal and state agencies for the money they spent on rescue and recovery operations.

Sales-Tax Ruling Strains Small Online Sellers

Eighteen months after the Supreme Court gave states the green light to tax online transactions, small companies that sell things as diverse as recycled yarn and gold bullion are struggling to adjust, the Wall Street Journal reported. In its June 2018 ruling, the Supreme Court held that states had the authority to make online retailers collect sales taxes even if they didn’t maintain a store, warehouse or other physical presence. Before the decision, consumers were supposed to pay what is known as use tax on out-of-state purchases, but most didn’t. The decision came in a lawsuit filed by South Dakota against home-furnishings retailer Wayfair Inc. and other online sellers. What is taxed and how often those taxes are paid varies from state to state. Some states, such as Colorado, allow localities to administer their own taxes. Some states share definitions and procedures to make it easier for companies to comply, but some of the biggest jurisdictions have their own rules. “Small businesses are definitely the ones that are really adversely affected,” said Clark Calhoun, a state and local tax attorney in Atlanta. “A bigger business is typically going to have more robust sales-tax software,” he said, as well as “a better sense of where their products are going and will be well over the sales thresholds every single year.” Verenda Smith, deputy director of the Federation of Tax Administrators, which represents state taxing authorities, said the state laws were never intended to affect small businesses. But “the fairness issue is equally on the table, and it can be at odds with the burden issue,” she said. Most states have tried to limit the impact on the smallest companies, with many following the lead of South Dakota, which exempted out-of-state sellers with $100,000 or less in sales or fewer than 200 transactions in the state a year. But limits vary, with a threshold of $500,000 in California and none in Kansas. (Subscription required.)

Corporate Debt Issuers to Kick Off Sales with Up to $35 Billion

Sales of U.S. high-grade bonds will total between $30 billion and $35 billion next week, according to an informal survey of dealers at some of Wall Street’s biggest banks, Bloomberg News reported. The market remains inviting for potentially supercharged debt-issuance, with funding costs at the best levels ever for the start of a year and incentive to get ahead of potential U.S. election-induced volatility beginning in March. About $120 billion is forecast for January, an increase of 9 percent from last year. The high-grade bond spread, the added premium over U.S. Treasuries that investors get paid to hold riskier debt, fell to 93 basis points on Tuesday, the tightest level since February 2018. Meanwhile, there is about $78 billion in U.S. high-grade corporate bonds coming due or that may be called in January, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Americans Are Taking Cash out of Their Homes — And It Is Costing Them

Many U.S. homeowners who need cash are taking it out of their properties, but the trade-off is higher interest rates, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis. Over the past two years, a big chunk of homeowners took on higher interest rates when they refinanced to tap into their home equity. These cash-out refinancings, as they are known, free up money that homeowners can use to pay down credit card debt, renovate or invest in a new property. Nearly 60 percent of cash-out refinancings in 2018 came with higher interest rates, the biggest share since before the financial crisis, according to Black Knight Inc., a mortgage-data and technology firm. This year, that number fell to around 44 percent of cash-out deals, but it remains at more than three times its average between 2009 and 2017. This corner of the mortgage market illuminates the crosscurrents in the U.S. economy: After roughly a decade of rising home prices, homeowners are flush with record amounts of home equity they can tap. But many Americans remain short on cash and are increasingly relying on debt to fund their lives. “There’s something in their life that is causing them to need money,” said Sam Polland, a mortgage-loan officer at Sandy Spring Bank in Rockville, Md. “They are willing to go up in rate to get the equity out of their house.” (Subscription required.)

Sign up Today to Receive Rochelle’s Daily Wire by E-mail!
Have you signed up for Rochelle’s Daily Wire in the ABI Newsroom? Receive Bill Rochelle’s exclusive perspectives and analyses of important case decisions via e-mail!

Tap into Rochelle’s Daily Wire via the ABI Newsroom and Twitter!

PRESIDENTIAL PARTNERS

Bloomberg Law

Gavin / Solmonese

Thompson-Reuters
 

 

 
BLOG EXCHANGE

New on ABI’s Bankruptcy Blog Exchange: Supreme Court Set to Hear Passive Stay Violation Case

Seeking to resolve a 5-3 split among the courts of appeals, the Supreme Court will consider whether a creditor that passively retains property of the estate violates the automatic stay. Case No. 19-357, City of Chicago v. Fulton. The Second, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth and Eleventh Circuits have ruled that retaining possession or control of property of the debtor violates the stay. The Third, Tenth and D.C. Circuits have held that passive retention of property is not an "act" to exercise control over property of the estate.

For further analysis of this case, be sure to read Rochelle's Daily Wire.

To read more on this blog and all others on the ABI Blog Exchange, please click here.

 
© 2020 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314
 

Pages