This article will discuss, in two parts, how real estate developers of projects large and small are experiencing an industry-wide slowdown as mortgage money dries
Committees Committee
Committees
![Photo of Jason Binford[1]](https://abi-org-corp.s3.amazonaws.com/committee/Authors/ABICommitteeLogo_219.png)
This is the final article in a four-part series discussing collusion in bankruptcy sales.
There’s a chap who sits at the end of the bar in my favorite pub, just around the corner from my brother’s Thames-side flat in London, who knows everything.
Recently, in In re Enron Corp., et al., v. Springfield Associates, L.L.C. et al., (In re Enron) 2007 WL 2446498 (S.D.N.Y.), (Springfield) the U.S.
The Appointment of an Examiner
![Photo of Jason Binford[1]](https://abi-org-corp.s3.amazonaws.com/committee/Authors/ABICommitteeLogo_221.png)
Part I of this four-part series discussed, in general terms, the prohibition of collusion in bankruptcy sales under section 363(n) of the Bankruptcy Code.
Does this sound familiar? A client contacts you, very upset. A debtor, often a former spouse, significant other or business partner, has filed for bankruptcy.
Just when we think we’ve seen it all, something new shows up. This story was reported recently in the Houston Chronicle.
The term “fraudulent insolvency” needs explaining before we go any further: It is an insolvency either caused by or involving criminal acts.
When looking for evidence of fraudulent intent, lack of good faith or lack of equivalent value, two recent cases involving fraudulent conveyance actions brought un