Bankruptcy Brief

Senator Warren Takes Aim at Private-Equity Funds

ABI Bankruptcy Brief

July 18, 2019

 
ABI Bankruptcy Brief
 
NEWS AND ANALYSIS

Senator Warren Takes Aim at Private-Equity Funds

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) is teaming up with a slate of fellow congressional Democrats calling for greater federal regulation of private-equity firms, which the presidential candidate likened to vampires, in a policy proposal that would alter the way the funds acquire other companies, the Wall Street Journal reported. Warren unveiled legislation today that would require private-equity funds to assume responsibility for the liabilities of companies under their control — including debt and pension-related obligations. The bill, called the Stop Wall Street Looting Act of 2019, would also make private-equity firms legally liable when a company in their portfolio runs afoul of federal law. Warren contends that private-equity firms are only on the hook for their equity investments, not behavior at the firms, according to a Senate aide. Fund managers would also be required to make public their fees and returns, which are currently shielded from disclosure apart from what public pension funds are required to release. (Subscription required.)


Wall Street’s Answer to Risks in Loan Market: Bundle Lower-Rated Loans

A growing number of money managers are embracing a new strategy designed to benefit from volatility in junk-rated corporate loans, a sign of building worries about riskier borrowers and the market that supports them, the Wall Street Journal reported. Since November of last year, three different money managers have issued $1.6 billion of so-called enhanced collateralized loan obligations (CLOs), which are set up to hold a much larger amount of loans with extremely low credit ratings than typical CLOs. At least two more managers are expected to follow suit in the coming months. The emergence of the enhanced CLOs underscores investors’ growing belief the U.S. economy is due for a recession after more than a decade of expansion. It also reflects particular concerns about corporate loans, starting with a decline in their average credit ratings. Since 2011, the amount of loans rated B or B-minus — just above near-rock-bottom triple-C ratings — have ballooned to 39 percent of the market from 17 percent, according to LCD, a unit of S&P Global Market Intelligence. As a result, some investors worry that even a modest economic slowdown could lead to a rash of loans being downgraded to triple-C. That could force selling from standard CLOs, which are designed to fill only 7.5 percent of their portfolios with triple-C rated loans. But it could also create opportunities for the new CLOs to buy the downgraded loans at steep discounts because they can stock up to half their portfolios with triple-C debt. (Subscription required.)



Report: More than One in Four Consumers Have a Debt in Collection with a Third-Party Collector

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) released a report today that found that more than one in four consumers with a credit report have at least one debt in collection by third-party debt collectors, according to a press release. Today’s report, which covers 2004 to 2018, is drawn from the Bureau’s Consumer Credit Panel (CCP), a nationally representative sample of approximately 5 million de-identified credit records maintained by one of the three nationwide credit reporting companies. Close to 900 third-party debt collectors furnished collection tradelines in the CCP. A tradeline is information about a consumer account that is sent, generally on a regular basis, to a credit reporting company. Tradelines contain data such as account balance, payment history and status of the account. Today’s findings show that more than one in four consumers (28 percent) with a credit report in the CCP in 2018 had at least one third-party collections tradeline on their file. The study also found that more than three out of four third-party collections tradelines are for nonfinancial debt: More than half (58 percent) of these tradelines are for medical debt, and another 20 percent are for telecommunications or utilities debt. Positive payment information is generally not furnished for medical or telecommunications debt. Banks and other original creditors may collect their own debts or hire third-party debt collectors. In some instances, the original creditors may sell the debts to debt buyers. The buyers may try to collect on these debts, or hire other third-party debt collectors. There are approximately 9,330 debt collectors and debt buyers in the U.S. Read the full report.


 

Private Tax Debt Collection Is Working, Grassley Says

The main sponsor of the IRS program under which certain tax debt is turned over to private debt collectors to attempt to collect (and keep a portion of anything paid), Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), says the most recent assessment shows that the program is working well, Fed Week reported. A report from an IRS component shows that the program brought in $82 million in 2018 and estimates $114 million in 2019. “As a direct result of the success of the program, the IRS will be able to hire 200 additional special compliance personnel by 2020," Grassley said. "This is the most recent in a series of reports that have given me confidence in the program’s ability to make the system fairer for law-abiding citizens while also strengthening the effectiveness of the IRS.” The current program is the latest in a series that have started and stopped over the years involving debt that the IRS has essentially written off as uncollectible because it needs to focus its available resources on higher-priority collections. It became law in 2015 largely at Grassley’s initiative, six years after a prior program was canceled.


 

Puerto Ricans in Protests Say They’ve Had Enough

For a fifth consecutive day, protestors in Puerto Rico are demanding Gov. Ricardo A. Rosselló’s resignation, the New York Times reported. Ostensibly, the demonstrators were protesting the arrogant and crass exchanges by the governor and his inner circle in a leaked group chat and the corruption of top politicians unveiled by a series of high-profile arrests. But the forceful display on the streets of Old San Juan amounted to a rejection of decades of scandals and mismanagement involving affluent and disconnected leaders who have time and again benefited at the expense of suffering Puerto Ricans. Rosselló’s tenure has been defined by the hurricane that hit less than nine months after his inauguration. Many people did not have electricity for months, and the storm is estimated to have left several thousand people dead — a grim reality that the governor’s administration was slow to acknowledge. Rosselló has also overseen thousands of layoffs, cuts to public services, school closures and tuition hikes as a result of a 12-year economic recession and Puerto Rico’s debt crisis. Not all of those measures were Rosselló’s doing: The island’s finances are managed by an oversight board created by Congress.

Latest ABI Podcast Highlights Consumer Commission Recommendations on BAPCPA's Credit Counseling Requirement, Means Test Provisions

Members of ABI's Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy recently discussed the recommendations in the Final Report focused on the Code's credit counseling and financial management course requirements, and means test provisions. The Commission's recommendations address provisions established by the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA) that made obtaining the financial fresh start of bankruptcy more challenging for consumer debtors. Retired Bankruptcy Judge Randall Dunn moderates the discussion with John Rao of the National Consumer Law Center, Ariane Holtschlag of the Law Office of William J. Factor, Ltd. and Wendell Sherk of SkerkLaw.



Click here to download your copy of the Final Report of the ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy.

Sign up Today to Receive Rochelle’s Daily Wire by E-mail!
Have you signed up for Rochelle’s Daily Wire in the ABI Newsroom? Receive Bill Rochelle’s exclusive perspectives and analyses of important case decisions via e-mail!

Tap into Rochelle’s Daily Wire via the ABI Newsroom and Twitter!

BLOG EXCHANGE

New on ABI’s Bankruptcy Blog Exchange: Policymakers Shouldn’t Undermine Existing Overdraft Regulations

The current overdraft rules could use some tweaks, but should largely remain the same to protect consumers, according to a recent blog post.

To read more on this blog and all others on the ABI Blog Exchange, please click here.

 
© 2019 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314
 

House Approves Family Farmer Relief Act of 2019 (H.R. 2336)

July 25, 2019

 
ABI Bankruptcy Brief
 
NEWS AND ANALYSIS

House Approves Family Farmer Relief Act of 2019 (H.R. 2336)

The U.S. House of Representatives today passed the Family Farmer Relief Act of 2019 (H.R. 2336). ABI testified in June in support of the bipartisan and bicameral bill, and it is also supported by the American College of Bankruptcy, the American Farm Bureau and the American Farmers Union. Rep. Antonio Delgado (D-N.Y.) introduced the bill on April 18, 2019. The current debt limit for chapter 12 filings is $4.3 million. H.R. 2336 would raise this limit to $10 million. Farm size has increased substantially since 1986; meanwhile, net farm income has declined since 2013. “For more than 30 years, chapter 12 has provided a durable tool to deal with the cyclical economic challenges faced in American agriculture, roiled by fluctuating land values, swings in commodity prices, weather calamities and adverse trade policies made by government,” said ABI Executive Director Samuel J. Gerdano. “Chapter 12 has not only assisted family farmers in their efforts to successfully reorganize debts in bankruptcy court, it has perhaps more significantly provided a framework that encouraged stakeholders to reach agreement on debt restructuring outside the expense of the formal bankruptcy process.” In a letter to the House Judiciary Committee, the American Bankers Association (ABA) had urged that Congress proceed with caution on approving the increase, emphasizing the importance of having ready capital available to farmers at low interest rates. The ABA also cited the 2018 Farm Bill as having greatly strengthened the farm economy since its passage. A bipartisan companion bill is pending in the Senate.

Commentary*: I’m a Private Equity Investor. Here’s Why We Need to Rein In Private Equity

If you look at our economy from 30,000 feet, it’s easy to believe President Donald Trump’s boasts that we’re living in boom times. But if you get closer to the ground, where too many good jobs are being replaced by precarious ones, where large-scale employers waver at the brink of going under, and where the faux boom’s profits are overwhelmingly going to the wealthy, you can see a practice escalating across the economy, a practice that has already had disastrous effects on workers generally and with the potential to take down hundreds of thousands more jobs and put investors and consumers alike in jeopardy, according to a commentary in Fortune. That practice is the unchecked and reckless overuse of heavy burdens of debt, and then of bankruptcy laws, by some private-equity (PE) firms and hedge funds to the overwhelming detriment of employees and retirees. That’s why we all need to pay attention to a new bill introduced this week by Sen. Elizabeth Warren and other members of Congress that would curtail the threat financial predators pose and remove the incentives for them to further harm our economy, according to the commentary. It would also eliminate a tax abuse that Trump even campaigned he would eliminate — namely, the so-called carried-interest loophole. Though the existence of private-equity firms and hedge funds is taken for granted today, the PE boom really took off in the mid-1980s. Before Gordon Gekko and his maxim that “greed is good,” things worked differently. Private-equity investors had a specialization then that they focused on, says the commentary, and when they invested, they invested for the long term.



*The views expressed in this commentary are from the author/publication cited, are meant for informative purposes only, and are not an official position of ABI.

Commentary*: Elizabeth Warren's Private-Equity Proposal Encourages Abuses

Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s “Stop Wall Street Looting Act of 2019” is designed to curtail abuses by private equity funds. Most of the resulting commentary has focused on whether private equity is good or bad, or whether the Act would be effective. However you feel about those things, a more important point is the Act seems designed to encourage the abuses it decries, according to a Bloomberg commentary. In a typical PE deal, a fund combines the equity capital from its investors with a lot of borrowed money to buy a public company and take it private. The fund may sell some of the company’s non-core assets and restructure what’s left to create a company that in five or 10 years can be sold back to the public markets. The fund’s main reward is a percentage, often 20 percent, of the total collected from sales minus the initial equity investment. It also collects management fees from investors in the fund as well as for services provided to the company it controls. One of Warren’s main complaints is that PE firms initially sell too much of an acquired firm, leaving the surviving entity smaller and less viable. So she proposes a 100 percent tax on the fees that PE funds collect from the companies they control. It’s possible that in response, a PE fund would merely bill its investors, who are the ultimate payers in either case, but either way it creates a strong incentive for PE funds to sell more assets, and keep fewer. The PE fund will prefer to sell businesses and assets rather than incur the costs of managing them, if it cannot charge to recoup those costs. Moreover, money from sales is not confiscated. This makes any struggling company — especially one with hard-to-predict pension, litigation or regulatory problems — radioactive, according to the commentary. (Subscription required.)



*The views expressed in this commentary are from the author/publication cited, are meant for informative purposes only, and are not an official position of ABI.

Op-Ed*: Puerto Rico’s Political Meltdown

Puerto Rico Governor Ricardo Rosselló announced late Wednesday that he’ll resign, effective Aug. 2, amid widespread protests and a text-message imbroglio. The question is whether it even matters given the general corruption of the island’s political class, according to an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal. The immediate cause for the protests was a 900-page report by the Center for Investigative Journalism last week publishing messages between Mr. Rosselló and his aides that denigrate female politicians, gays, fat people and Puerto Ricans in general. Also fueling the revolt are federal corruption charges two weeks ago against former members of his administration. The economy has been in a downward spiral since 2006, and more than 500,000 have fled. For decades high taxes and inflexible labor laws have depressed investment and incentives to work. Politicians awarded public workers even more generous compensation financed by tax hikes and government debt. By 2016 the commonwealth had amassed $74 billion in debt — more than 100% of gross national income — plus nearly $50 billion in pension obligations. Yet Mr. Rosselló has fought and flouted reform. The oversight board has slashed spending, but the governor has sued to block the board’s labor and fiscal reforms, and the First Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments this week over its authority. The truth is that bondholders will be scalped under the board’s restructuring plan to preserve public services and retiree pensions. But the debt reductions must be paired with government reforms or nothing will change, according to the op-ed.



*The views expressed in this op-ed are from the author/publication cited, are meant for informative purposes only, and are not an official position of ABI.

Op-Ed*: Everyone Claims They’re Worried About Global Finance, but Only One Side Has a Plan

Global finance has become a popular target from both the left and, more recently, the right, particularly the nationalist right. Renationalizing finance is a pressing task for any transformative government. But so far, only the left has any tangible plans on how finance can be brought down to earth and tamed toward more humane ends, according to a New York Times op-ed. Spin a globe, and you’ll see a colorful mosaic of states snug in their national borders. But the world of finance has long ceased to work this way. There are nearly 200 sovereign countries, but globally only a few dozen banks matter. We don’t live in a world of islands but inside what has been described as a “matrix of interlocking corporate balance sheets.” Financial institutions operate across territories with little respect for borders, wreaking havoc on the ability of countries to plan for a sustainable future. Despite recent criticism from some nationalist conservatives, the right has largely ignored the problem, according to the op-ed. President Trump tapped Goldman Sachs heavily to staff his cabinet and plans no walls for the movement of money over borders. The systematic defunding of the IRS means that even routine audits are becoming rare, let alone the investigation of taxable income held offshore. Rather than extend tax surveillance outward, the 2017 Trump tax plan slashed the corporate tax at home. Even when the problems are acknowledged by the right, the details are foggy and more time is spent targeting the “cosmopolitan elite” than offering effective, concrete solutions. By contrast, on the left, ideas are crackling. Elizabeth Warren recently announced her “economic patriotism” agenda, with financial reform at its heart. Other proposals from what The Guardian called the “new left economics” target venerable institutions of financial management. And central banks — long seen as bastions of economic orthodoxy — are being called upon to help avert an environmental catastrophe, as climate change poses imminent risks to financial stability that need to be factored in to central bank models, according to the op-ed.



*The views expressed in this op-ed are from the author/publication cited, are meant for informative purposes only, and are not an official position of ABI.

Study Finds Just 54% of U.S. Student Loan Borrowers Make Consistent Payments

Just 54 percent of U.S. student-loan borrowers are making consistent payments, instead alternating between months of larger payments or no payment at all, according to a study from the JPMorgan Chase Institute that underscores the burden of educational expenses for millions of Americans, Crains Cleveland reported. Among borrowers who started making payments, as many as 59 percent might be making no payment at any given time, the institute said in a report released Wednesday in Washington, D.C. The payment status changes reflect income swings and show that families are less consistent paying student loans than those for cars and homes. Student-loan balances outstanding have more than doubled in the past decade to about $1.5 trillion, held by almost a fifth of the population, Federal Reserve Bank of New York data show. Though the typical family paid 5.5 percent of take-home income toward student loans in months where a payment was made, the financial burden weighs the most on young and low-income households, according to the report by institute President Diana Farrell, a former economic adviser to President Barack Obama, and fellow researchers Fiona Greig and Erica Deadman. The institute found that one in four borrowers under 25 spends 16.8 percent or more of take-home pay on student loans, while households making $50,000 or less spent 14.7 percent or more.

Analysis: Is the Future of Banking All Bitcoin and Blockchain?

At the beginning of July, news broke of Deutsche Bank staff being sent home as 18,000 job cuts began unraveling. Taking a look at what is happening in the world of banking that has led to job cuts, and concerns for the traditional way of doing things in finance, posits a question: Just how far are we from a future predicated on Bitcoin and blockchain in banking? Beyond the high-rise glass structures in the city center, there are signs of a new way of managing and controlling your money on a day-to-day basis: challenger banks, according to an analysis in Forbes. Challenger banks are defined as small, recently created retail banks that compete directly with the longer-established banks in the country, sometimes by specializing in areas underserved by the “big four” banks. These banks, also called App-banks, are usually highly customer focused and made to be as user-friendly and as easy to operate on a day-to-day basis as they can. In comparison with traditional banks, challenger banks try and play to general user frustrations from the big institutional banks. Indeed, the banking legacy and way of doing things has become so stagnant that the wants of the banks and the needs of the customers almost do not line up anymore — especially on a day-to-day basis, according to the analysis. Challenger banks could be the fresh start customers have been wanting, but, in comparison, cryptocurrencies and blockchain could be an entirely fresh system.

U.S. Retail Sales Ease Fears over Economy; Rate Cut Still Seen

U.S. retail sales increased more than expected in June, pointing to strong consumer spending, which could help to blunt some of the drag on the economy from weak business investment, Reuters reported. The report from the Commerce Department on Tuesday did not change market expectations that the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates this month for the first time in a decade. But coming on the heels of solid employment growth in June and a pick-up in underlying inflation, the signs of strong consumer spending further reduced the possibility of the U.S. central bank cutting rates by 50 basis points at its July 30-31 policy meeting, as markets had initially anticipated. Fed Chairman Jerome Powell last week told lawmakers the central bank would “act as appropriate” to protect the economy against risks stoked by a trade war between the U.S. and China, as well as slowing global growth. Retail sales increased 0.4 percent last month as households stepped up purchases of motor vehicles and a variety of other goods, including furniture and building materials. Data for May was revised slightly down to show retail sales gaining 0.4 percent instead of rising 0.5 percent as previously reported. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast retail sales edging up 0.1 percent in June. Compared to June of last year, retail sales advanced 3.4 percent.

Sign up Today to Receive Rochelle’s Daily Wire by E-mail!
Have you signed up for Rochelle’s Daily Wire in the ABI Newsroom? Receive Bill Rochelle’s exclusive perspectives and analyses of important case decisions via e-mail!

Tap into Rochelle’s Daily Wire via the ABI Newsroom and Twitter!

BLOG EXCHANGE

New on ABI’s Bankruptcy Blog Exchange: Facebook’s Bid to Break Banking

The social media giant says its cryptocurrency project can bring services to the world's unbanked, but lawmakers and regulators aren’t so sure, according to a recent blog post.

To read more on this blog and all others on the ABI Blog Exchange, please click here.

 
© 2019 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314
 

 

Senate Passes Four Bipartisan, Bicameral Bankruptcy Bills

August 1, 2019

 
ABI Bankruptcy Brief
 
 
 
 
NEWS AND ANALYSIS

Senate Passes Four Bipartisan, Bicameral Bankruptcy Bills

The U.S. Senate today passed four bipartisan and bicameral bankruptcy bills before adjourning for its August recess. The bills are H.R. 3311, the Small Business Reorganization Act; H.R. 2336, the Family Farmer Relief Act; H.R. 2938, the Honoring American Veterans in Extreme Need Act (HAVEN Act); and H.R. 3304, the National Guard and Reservist Debt Relief Extension Act. ABI testified in support of H.R. 3311, H.R. 2336 and H.R. 2938. All the bills passed the U.S. House of Representatives last week and are non-controversial. The bills received unanimous consent to proceed to passage. The legislation will now be sent to President Trump to be signed into law. Click here to read ABI’s press release.

Consumer Groups Seek Extension of FDCPA Comment Period

Consumer advocacy groups have formally requested a two-month extension — to Oct. 21 — on the comment period for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s proposed debt-collection rule, Auto Finance News reported. The comment period is currently set to expire on Aug. 19. Seven advocacy groups signed the letter, citing the long and complicated nature of the proposal. “The proposal’s broad and potential impact — on virtually every person in this country — adds to the complexity of analyzing and commenting on the implications for different constituencies,” the letter said. In fact, the consumer advocacy groups hold that these rules affect not only consumers with debt, but “anyone who may mistakenly be the subject of debt collection communications and litigation against the wrong person, wrong number or email address, or debts paid long ago,” making it difficult to respond adequately. Further, the letter cites the CFPB’s other activities as having consumed many of the resources of the consumer advocacy groups, including a proposal to rescind much of the payday loan rule, request for comment on overdraft opt-in rules, and the proposed rule under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act. As of yesterday, 1,978 comments on the proposal had been submitted on the CFPB’s website.



Tapping Homes for Cash to Get Tougher Under New FHA Limits

The Trump administration is moving to restrict mortgage refinancings in which borrowers withdraw cash, the latest effort to curb the federal government’s exposure to potential defaults, the Wall Street Journal reported. The Federal Housing Administration, an arm of the Department of Housing and Urban Development that insures loans for mostly first-time buyers, announced today that it will limit cash-out refinancings in its program. Borrowers will be able to pull cash out only when the new loan amounts to 80 percent of the value of the home or less, down from 85 percent. The policy change, expected to take effect in September, follows a sharp rise in the use of cash-out refinancings over the past several years. Officials believe this has added risk to the $1.3 trillion government mortgage program. Borrowers aren’t tapping their homes for nearly as much cash as they did before the financial crisis. But rising home prices have rewarded owners with more equity in their homes, and many are turning it into cash to make home improvements or pay bills. In the FHA program, there were nearly 151,000 cash-out refinances in the 12 months that ended in September, versus roughly 43,000 during the same period five years earlier. (Subscription required.)

Commentary: Mortgage Rates Are Already Lower, but Not Providing a Spark to Homebuying*

Cheaper mortgages are usually a boon to the housing market, but this year, a sharp drop in mortgage rates hasn’t provided much of a lift, according to a New York Times commentary. Consumer borrowing costs, including mortgage rates, are heavily influenced by the market for government bonds, and yields on those bonds have been falling this year. Similarly, the rate on the 30-year fixed mortgage rate is down more than one percentage point, to 3.75 percent last week, according to Freddie Mac. Over the last 30 years, the rate has averaged about 6.25 percent. So the current rates might reasonably have been expected to spark a flurry of refinancing and home buying. But, because of rising home prices, there has been no boom so far. Through June, sales of existing homes were down 2 percent from a year earlier, and investment in residential structures had declined for six straight quarters. Sales of newly built homes remain well below their recent peak in late 2017. The housing market has traditionally been one of the most important channels by which the Fed’s rates can influence the economy because it can spur construction employment, sales of appliances and furniture, and services such as landscaping, all of which multiply the economic impact of a home’s purchase. But the math facing prospective American home buyers is daunting. Since June 2009, when the U.S. economy started its current expansion, the median price of existing homes has risen nearly 60 percent, far outpacing the 24 percent gain in median weekly earnings.



*The views expressed in this commentary are from the author/publication cited, are meant for informative purposes only, and are not an official position of ABI.

Sign up Today to Receive Rochelle’s Daily Wire by E-mail!
Have you signed up for Rochelle’s Daily Wire in the ABI Newsroom? Receive Bill Rochelle’s exclusive perspectives and analyses of important case decisions via e-mail!

Tap into Rochelle’s Daily Wire via the ABI Newsroom and Twitter!

BLOG EXCHANGE

New on ABI’s Bankruptcy Blog Exchange: HUD Plan Would Raise Bar for Claims of Fair-Lending Abuse

Under a proposal yet to be officially unveiled, plaintiffs relying on the so-called “disparate impact” doctrine would have to show a more direct link between a lender’s policy and discriminatory effect, according to a recent blog post.

To read more on this blog and all others on the ABI Blog Exchange, please click here.

 
© 2019 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314
 

House Judiciary Committee to Hold Hearing Next Wednesday Examining SBRA, HAVEN Act, Chapter 12, Student Debt and More

ABI Bankruptcy Brief

June 13, 2019

 
ABI Bankruptcy Brief
 
NEWS AND ANALYSIS

House Judiciary Committee to Hold Hearing Next Wednesday Examining SBRA, HAVEN Act, Chapter 12, Student Debt and More

The House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law will hold a hearing next Wednesday at 2 p.m. EDT titled "Oversight of Bankruptcy Law and Legislative Proposals." Robert J. Keach of Bernstein Shur (Portland, Maine), a former ABI President and co-chair of the ABI Commission to Study the Reform of Chapter 11, will testify on ABI's behalf. The hearing will examine a number of bills and priority issues important to business and consumer bankruptcy practice. Most of the bills enjoy bipartisan and bicameral support in Congress. The following are the legislation and issues to be discussed:

- The Small Business Reorganization Act (S. 1091) takes into account recommendations from ABI's Chapter 11 Commission to remove barriers to bankruptcy for financially struggling small and medium-sized businesses.

- The Family Farmer Relief Act of 2019 (H.R. 2236; S. 897) is supported by ABI to raise the debt cap to $10 million for family farmers seeking chapter 12 protection.

- Honoring American Veterans in Extreme Need Act of 2019 (HAVEN Act) (H.R. 2938; S. 679) would exclude VA and DoD disability payments from the monthly income calculation used for bankruptcy means testing. The law currently allows Social Security benefits to be excluded from the calculation, but not veterans disability payments. ABI's Veterans’ Affairs Task Force member Holly Petraeus is scheduled to testify.

- Puerto Rico Recovery Accuracy in Disclosures Act of 2019 (PRRADA) (H.R. 683; S. 1675) would impose certain requirements on the payment of compensation to professional persons employed in voluntary cases commenced under PROMESA.

- The subcommittee will also be looking at the issue of student loan debt treatment in bankruptcy, which was the subject of the first set of reform recommendations in the Final Report of the ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy. Commissioners Prof. Dalié Jiménez of the UC Irvine School of Law and Ed Boltz of the Law Offices of John T. Orcutt, P.C. (Durham, N.C.) will be testifying on the issue.

For further information on the hearing and to obtain forthcoming witness testimony, please click here.

Senator Warren to Introduce Bill Cancelling Up to $50,000 in Student Debt for Most Borrowers

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) plans to introduce legislation in the coming weeks that mirrors her presidential campaign proposal to cancel at least a portion of the student debt held by many of the nation’s 44 million borrowers, MarketWatch.com reported. House Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.) will introduce companion legislation in the House of Representatives. Warren’s office hasn’t yet released a draft of the legislative text, but the bill is slated to propose cancelling up to $50,000 in student debt for the bulk of student loan borrowers, her office announced. Under the proposal Warren released as part of her presidential campaign in April, borrowers with a household income of less than $100,000 would have $50,000 of their student debt cancelled and borrowers with an income between $100,000 and $250,000 would be eligible for some student debt cancellation — though not the full $50,000. Borrowers earning $250,000 or more would receive no debt cancellation. Her campaign estimated that the plan would cost $640 billion.



In related news, only a small percentage of companies help their employees with student loan payments, despite it being a sought-after perk. But that could change dramatically if a proposed tweak to the Tax Code gains momentum in Congress, the Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday. There is no doubt that employees would welcome some kind of loan-relief benefit. A recent survey by YouGov commissioned by health care company Abbott Laboratories found that 64 percent of adults with student loan debt say that finding a company with student loan benefits is important. Yet last year, only about 4 percent of employers offered student loan repayment assistance as a workplace benefit, data from the Society for Human Resource Management show. Many HR managers say the biggest obstacle is the tax treatment that student loan repayment assistance currently gets. Employers have to pay a payroll tax on the contributions, while employees who receive such assistance have to report it as taxable income. To remove that snag, lawmakers in both houses of Congress earlier this year reintroduced bipartisan legislation that would permit employers to contribute up to $5,250 annually tax-free toward an employee’s student loans. The bills would accomplish this by expanding the section of the Tax Code that currently allows companies to provide tax-free tuition-reimbursement assistance in that amount to workers seeking to further their education. (Subscription required.)



A special ABI Podcast will be released later this month looking at the Consumer Commission’s recommendations on student loan debt and bankruptcy.

Risky Borrowing Is Making a Comeback, but Banks Are on the Sidelines

A decade after reckless home lending nearly destroyed the financial system, the business of making risky loans is back, the New York Times reported on Tuesday. This time, the money is bypassing the traditional, and heavily regulated, banking system and flowing through a growing network of businesses that have stepped in to provide loans to parts of the economy that banks abandoned after 2008. With almost $15 trillion in assets, the shadow-banking sector in the U.S. is roughly the same size as the entire banking system of Britain, the world’s fifth-largest economy. In certain areas — including mortgages, auto lending and some business loans — shadow banks have eclipsed traditional banks, which have spent much of the last decade pulling back on lending in the face of stricter regulatory standards aimed at keeping them out of trouble. But new problems arise when the industry depends on lenders that compete aggressively, operate with less of a cushion against losses and have fewer regulations to keep them from taking on too much risk. Recently, a chorus of industry officials and policymakers — including Federal Reserve Chair Jerome H. Powell — have started to signal that they’re watching the growth of riskier lending by these nonbanks. “We decided to regulate the banks, hoping for a more stable financial system, which doesn’t take as many risks,” said Amit Seru, a professor of finance at the Stanford Graduate School of Business. “Where the banks retreated, shadow banks stepped in.” Lately, that lending is coming from companies like Quicken Loans, loanDepot and Caliber Home Loans. Between 2009 and 2018, the share of mortgage loans made by these businesses and others like them soared from 9 percent to more than 52 percent, according to Inside Mortgage Finance. While they don’t have a nationwide regulator that ensures safety and soundness like banks do, non-banks say that they are monitored by a range of government entities, from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to state regulators.

Analysis: U.S. Tax Changes to Favor Companies over Lenders in Next Downturn

Companies that fund their businesses with highly leveraged loans and bonds are set to benefit from changes to the U.S. Tax Code that will allow them to raise cheap new financing by guaranteeing the debt with foreign assets, although the move could penalize existing lenders, according to a Reuters analysis. As well as offering cheaper borrowing costs, the analysis said that the tax change could be a lifeline for distressed companies that allows them to survive the next downturn by accessing new funds backed by foreign collateral at market rates, rather than paying punitive pricing. The changes could weaken existing lenders’ positions if companies run into trouble, as they could be barred from making direct claims on the revenue generated by foreign assets and subsidiaries. The Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) published final regulations to section 956 of the Tax Code in May that allows U.S. companies to guarantee debt with revenue from foreign entities without incurring U.S. taxes. This has previously been an obstacle to pledging overseas assets and revenue. “If the borrower has the ability and desire to do their homework … the spectrum of possibilities, especially for corporations, is much larger as to what they can do without incurring tax in the U.S.,” said Elena Romanova, a partner at law firm Latham & Watkins. Access to new collateral to raise financing in the $1.2 trillion loan market to repay debt or fund operations is expected to be cheaper and could even help distressed companies avoid bankruptcy.


 

Law Students Press SCOTUS to Make Legal Tools Free Nationwide

More than 100 law students, along with nearly 100 solo and small-firm practitioners and legal educators, are urging the U.S. Supreme Court to eliminate copyright protection for state annotated codes of law and certain other state and local legal materials, the National Law Journal reported. The case Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org is unusual in that both parties, and all of the friends of the court, including the law students, want the justices to take up and decide the case — but for different reasons. The justices are scheduled to take their first look at the case in their private conference scheduled for today. At the center of Georgia’s petition at the Supreme Court is the “government edicts” doctrine, a judicially created exception to copyright protection for certain works that have the force of law. The doctrine dates to the 1800s, and three high court opinions have held that judicial opinions are not copyrightable. The justices have not addressed it since, but it has been applied by lower courts also to exempt statutes from copyright protection. Georgia asked the justices to reverse a decision last year by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. The appeals court, applying the government edicts doctrine, invalidated the state’s copyright in the Official Code of Georgia Annotated. Georgia had sued nonprofit Public.Resource.Org for alleged infringement after it posted volumes of the annotated code online. The annotated code contains such materials as summaries of judicial decisions and state attorney general opinions. The code without annotations is free to the public.

Sign up Today to Receive Rochelle’s Daily Wire by E-mail!
Have you signed up for Rochelle’s Daily Wire in the ABI Newsroom? Receive Bill Rochelle’s exclusive perspectives and analyses of important case decisions via e-mail!

Tap into Rochelle’s Daily Wire via the ABI Newsroom and Twitter!

BLOG EXCHANGE

New on ABI’s Bankruptcy Blog Exchange: CFTC Holds a Public Meeting to Address Climate-Related Financial Risks

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s (CFTC) Market Risk Advisory Committee (MRAC) held a public meeting yesterday focusing on climate-related financial risks, according to a recent blog post.

To read more on this blog and all others on the ABI Blog Exchange, please click here.

 
© 2019 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314
 

Analysis: Canceling Student Debt Has a Life-Changing Effect on Borrowers — and Raises Their Income by an Average of $4,000

ABI Bankruptcy Brief

May 9, 2019

 
ABI Bankruptcy Brief
 
 
 
NEWS AND ANALYSIS

Analysis: Canceling Student Debt Has a Life-Changing Effect on Borrowers — and Raises Their Income by an Average of $4,000

Cancelling student loans frees up borrowers to make decisions that can improve their financial lives, according to a working paper distributed this week by the National Bureau of Economic Research, MarketWatch.com reported yesterday. When roughly 10,000 borrowers had their private student loans cancelled, they were more likely than similar borrowers to move, change jobs or return to school, the paper found. They also saw their incomes increase by $4,000 over a three-year period on average, which equates to roughly two months’ salary on average. In addition, these borrowers were less likely to rely on other forms of credit — reducing their indebtedness by 26 percent — and 12 percent less likely to default on those accounts, the researchers found. “There are quite significant benefits of intervening in the student loan market by forgiving student debt,” said Marco Di Maggio, a professor at Harvard Business School and one of the authors of the paper.



The issue of student loan debt and bankruptcy is the first problem addressed in the Final Report of the ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy. Click here to download your copy.

Sanders, Ocasio-Cortez Want to Cap Credit Card Interest Rates at 15 Percent

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) will introduce legislation today to cap credit card interest rates at 15 percent, the Washington Post reported. Sanders, the Vermont senator running for the Democratic nomination for president, said that a decade after taxpayers bailed out big banks, the industry is taking advantage of the public by charging exorbitant rates. “Wall Street today makes tens of billions from people at outrageous interest rates,” he said. Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) will introduce the House version of the bill. “There is no reason a person should pay more than 15 percent interest in the United States,” she said on Twitter. “It’s a debt trap for working people + it has to end.” In addition to a 15 percent federal cap on interest rates, states could establish their own lower limits under the legislation.

Commentary: Leveraged-Loan Pushback Is Too Little, Too Late

For fund managers, it’s easy to be picky when money is tight, but not so simple when they’re rolling in cash, according to a Bloomberg commentary on Tuesday. Leveraged-loan investors are suddenly willing to push back on the pervasive weakening of covenants, the safeguards in offering documents that are meant to protect creditors. In January, Moody’s Investors Service determined that covenant quality in leveraged loans was the worst on record in the third quarter of 2018. It hasn’t gotten much better since. On Monday, the Federal Reserve echoed that sentiment, further amplifying its warnings about risky corporate debt in a twice-a-year financial stability report. “Credit standards for new leveraged loans appear to have deteriorated further over the past six months,” the Fed said, with its board voting unanimously to approve the document. “The historically high level of business debt and the recent concentration of debt growth among the riskiest firms could pose a risk to those firms and, potentially, their creditors.” It might be too little, too late for investors to get tough on leveraged-loan issuers, according to the commentary. Already, UBS Group AG estimates that loan owners may end up recouping about 40 cents on the dollar in a downturn, potentially less than half what they’d historically expect to get. Moody’s has estimated recovery rates of 61 percent on first-lien loans and 14 percent on second-lien obligations in a recession, down from long-term historical averages of 77 percent and 43 percent, respectively.

Pensions Have Tripled Their Investment in High-Risk Assets, but Research Questions Whether It Is Paying Off

Public pensions are more invested than ever before in high-risk and expensive assets like real estate and hedge funds, yet research continues to show that this tactic is unlikely to improve their earnings, Governing magazine reported yesterday. According to Fitch Ratings, in the span of a decade, pensions tripled their average investment in these so-called alternative investments. In 2007, they averaged 9 percent of state and local public pension investment portfolios. By 2017, that number had risen to 27 percent. During that period, median average returns on overall investments were 6.2 percent, according to Fitch. But during the longer period between 2001 and 2017, reflecting a time of less reliance on alternative investments, they were actually slightly better: 6.4 percent. “If you look at trends and allocation to riskier assets and the returns we see alongside them, you clearly see that you can’t necessarily say you’re getting the bang for the buck over the last 17 years,” says Fitch analyst Olu Sonola, who authored the report. The report adds to the growing body of evidence that alternative investments are not worth the extra cost and risk. In fact, they may be lowering pensions' earnings and costing state and local governments more money. Pensions' average investment returns — overall, not just on alternatives — failed to meet expectations between 2001 and 2017, even though those expectations lowered from 8 percent to 7.5 percent. Plans that don’t meet expectations require state or local governments to put more money in pension systems. Even high-performing pension systems like Colorado, Oklahoma, Utah and Wisconsin have had to increase their payments or give up being fully funded for this reason.

Trump Taking Aim at ‘Surprise Medical Bills’

President Donald Trump will begin a push today to fight health care sticker shock by limiting “surprise medical bills,” the unexpected charges faced by insured patients when a member of a health care team that treated them is not in their insurer’s network, the Associated Press reported. Senior administration officials said that Trump will outline principles he can support as part of legislation to limit such billing practices. Patients being treated for medical emergencies often are in no position to check into whether their insurers have contracted with their surgeons or anesthesiologists to provide medical care. Trump wants to make it clear that patients who receive emergency care should not be hit with charges that exceed the amount paid to in-network providers. “Surprise” bills amounting to tens of thousands of dollars can hit patients and their families when they are most vulnerable — after a medical emergency or following a complex surgical procedure. Often patients are able to negotiate lower charges by working with their insurers and the medical providers. But the process usually takes months, adding stress and anxiety. The officials said that the legislation also should protect patients seeking elective care by ensuring that they are fully informed before scheduling their care about which providers will be considered out of network and what extra costs that will generate.

Small Mortgages Are Getting Harder to Come By

Some low- and middle-income home buyers are having a hard time getting mortgages for an unexpected reason: The loans they’re applying for are too small, the Wall Street Journal reported today. Lenders extended about 106,000 mortgages with balances between $10,000 and $70,000 in the U.S. last year, worth $5.1 billion. That is down 38 percent from almost 171,000 in 2009, according to figures compiled by Attom Data Solutions, a real estate data firm. The drop-off at the bottom end of the market has been far swifter than at the top. Origination was down a more modest 26 percent for mortgages between $70,000 and $150,000, and it rose 65 percent for mortgages above that range. Only about a quarter of homes that sold for less than $70,000 were financed with a mortgage, while almost 80% of sales between $70,000 and $150,000 had one, according to an Urban Institute analysis last year. Low-end borrowers had their applications denied at a higher rate than those taking out bigger mortgages even when comparing borrowers with similar credit quality, according to the think tank.

Latest ABI Podcast Examines the Intersection of Tribal Sovereignty and Bankruptcy

ABI Editor-at-Large Bill Rochelle talks with former ABI Resident Scholar Prof. Jack Williams of Georgia State School of Law (Atlanta) about the intersection of tribal sovereignty and bankruptcy law. Williams, who is of Native American descent and coordinates outreach to Native American tribes on ABI's Veterans Affairs Task Force, analyzes emerging issues regarding tribal sovereign immunity, the collision between state and tribal jurisdiction, and a brewing dispute over the ownership of former tribal lands and mineral rights. Click here to listen.

Sign up Today to Receive Rochelle’s Daily Wire by E-mail!
Have you signed up for Rochelle’s Daily Wire in the ABI Newsroom? Receive Bill Rochelle’s exclusive perspectives and analyses of important case decisions via e-mail!

Tap into Rochelle’s Daily Wire via the ABI Newsroom and Twitter!

BLOG EXCHANGE

New on ABI’s Bankruptcy Blog Exchange: Dear CFPB: Let the QM ‘Patch’ Expire

A GSE exemption in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s “qualified mortgage” rule is set to sunset in 2021, and regulators should not try to extend it as some experts have suggested, according to a recent blog post.

To read more on this blog and all others on the ABI Blog Exchange, please click here.

 
© 2019 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314

To UNSUBSCRIBE from future bankruptcy brief emails,
click here.

 

Remington's Bankruptcy Draws Spotlight on Private Equity's Financial Engineering

ABI Bankruptcy Brief

May 2, 2019

 
%%first_name%% %%last_name%%
Update profile
%%dynamic_content_227%%
ABI Bankruptcy Brief
 
 
NEWS AND ANALYSIS

Analysis: Remington's Bankruptcy Draws Spotlight on Private Equity's Financial Engineering

When private-equity firm Cerberus Capital Management bought Remington in 2007, sales were strong and the future bright, according to a New York Times analysis. A decade later, Remington couldn’t escape its debts and had to file for chapter 11 protection. In order to buy Remington, Cerberus created a new entity, a holding company. Instead of Cerberus buying a gun company, it put money into the holding company, and the holding company bought Remington. The entities were related, but each could borrow money independently. In 2010, Cerberus had the holding company borrow $225 million from an undisclosed group of lenders, most likely hedge funds. Because this loan was risky — the lenders would be paid only if Remington made a lot of money or was sold — the holding company offered a generous interest rate of around 11 percent, much higher than a typical corporate loan. When the interest payments were due, the holding company paid them not in cash but with paid-in-kind (PIK) notes. The holding company spent most of the $225 million buying back its own stock, effectively transferring all the borrowed cash to Cerberus. In April 2012, Cerberus had Remington borrow hundreds of millions of dollars and use it to buy the holding company’s debt, effectively transferring responsibility for the principal and the interest payments onto Remington. Because the operating company borrowed the money with a normal loan — and not with PIK notes — interest payments were required in cash. Suddenly Remington was carrying hundreds of millions of dollars in debt that, if it could not be paid, would cause the business to go bankrupt. After the 2016 election, researchers at Cerberus saw an omen in their data. Applications through the National Instant Criminal Background Check System, which are known as “NIC checks,” were dropping by double-digit percentages. A plunge in NIC checks foreshadows a corresponding plunge in gun sales, which is what happened in the months that followed. Remington’s profit slid toward zero. Remington had been loaded with debt; now it couldn’t pay the interest. Banks controlling the debt made a proposal: They would exchange the money they were owed for an ownership stake in Remington via a “debt-for-equity swap” in chapter 11 bankruptcy. This arrangement would allow Remington to stay running, albeit under distant ownership, until a plan could be drawn up for its future, such as a sale or a liquidation of assets.



Puerto Rico Governor Requests Fiscal Board Be Removed as Representative in Restructurings

While Gov. Ricardo Rosselló praised the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management and Economic Stability Act (PROMESA) for providing tools to facilitate the island’s debt restructuring, he said that the panel should not meddle in the government’s affairs and should be removed as representative of the debtors in the commonwealth’s bankruptcy process, Caribbean Business reported today. Rosselló testified at a U.S. House Natural Resources Committee hearing today that was analyzing PROMESA and the operations of the oversight board it established. He said a “naïve and problematic” narrative exists that the island’s government is not doing its job, that the government refuses to carry out structural reforms, and that the oversight board is the solution to address said mismanagement. He listed structural reforms the government has implemented such as in education, energy, and an earned income tax credit.



Disputing this view, Puerto Rico Oversight Board Chairman José Carrion said in a New York Post commentary that years of local government fiscal mismanagement created a debt burden of more than $70 billion. That amount, plus $60 billion in unfunded pension liabilities, reflect a culture of government officials making promises they couldn’t afford and a decade of recession combining to engulf the island in a sea of red ink. The oversight board, appointed by Congress, is imposing budgetary discipline and making the case for deep economic reforms, according to Carrion. Thus far, the board has successfully renegotiated some of the island’s debt, and is working on agreements with the other creditors. There are several reforms Puerto Rico could take on, including welfare-to-work measures and making Puerto Rico an employee-at-will state. Unfortunately, the current government isn’t implementing all of these reforms, despite the fact that they could make Puerto Rico much easier to do business in and present a better case for attracting investments.



The House hearing comes a day after the Board filed more than 200 clawback actions targeting payments of more than $4 billion to creditors by the government, made while the commonwealth was in the zone of insolvency. Click here to read the prepared statements from today’s hearing.

Latest ABI Podcast Features New SIPC CEO Discussing Recovery Efforts in Madoff Case

ABI Editor-at-Large Bill Rochelle talks with Josephine Wang, who was named president and CEO of the Securities Investor Protection Corp. (SIPC) on April 1. Wang joined the legal staff of SIPC in 1983 and was promoted to General Counsel in 2004. She supervised the appeal by SIPC in the Second Circuit on the question of whether a trustee can recover fraudulent transfers from subsequent recipients abroad. Ruling that fraudulent transfer claims can reach recipients abroad, the appeals court reversed the district court. The reversal revived 88 lawsuits brought by the trustee in the Madoff case aiming to recover more than $3 billion. Listen to Wang discuss the Second Circuit’s “extraterritoriality” opinion, other key developments in the Madoff liquidation and SIPC's ongoing work to recover funds for victims of the Ponzi scheme.

As Retiree Health Care Bills Mount, Some States Have a Solution: Stop Paying

States across the U.S. are testing how far they can reduce health benefits for their retirees as a way of coping with mounting liabilities and balancing budgets, the Wall Street Journal reported. The cuts are a response to dramatic increases in medical costs, budget shortfalls and the introduction of new accounting rules forcing governments to be more public about how much they owe. Officials also face fewer legal hurdles to cutting retiree health benefits than they face with public pensions, which enjoy ironclad legal protections in many states. North Carolina, which will end future-retiree health care coverage for new workers hired in 2021, is not the only state to take more drastic measures. Kansas is now asking retirees to pay the full cost of their health care, pushing their monthly premiums to as much as $1,000. In Iowa, the state last year capped the contribution its flagship university makes to retirees’ health care, cutting the liability by $465 million. U.S. states as a group have promised hundreds of billions more in retiree health benefits than they have saved up. The gap for so-called post-employment benefits, which mainly consist of retiree health care, amounts to roughly $600 billion, according to government data compiled by Eaton Vance Corp. That is on top of the $1.4 trillion states need to pay for promised pension benefits, according to The Pew Charitable Trusts.

Developers See More Office Spaces in Malls as Retailers Close

As retailers close, developers are converting the space into offices to bring in stable rent and generate foot traffic for remaining stores, the New York Times reported. The biggest beneficiaries of the conversions are co-working enterprises, like WeWork, which provide shared work spaces primarily to entrepreneurs, freelancers and start-ups. The highest concentration of co-working spaces in retail nationally is in malls, according to an August study by global property company Jones Lang LaSalle. The same study predicted that co-working space in retail in general would grow at an annual rate of 25 percent through 2023.

Sign up Today to Receive Rochelle’s Daily Wire by E-mail!
Have you signed up for Rochelle’s Daily Wire in the ABI Newsroom? Receive Bill Rochelle’s exclusive perspectives and analyses of important case decisions via e-mail!

Tap into Rochelle’s Daily Wire via the ABI Newsroom and Twitter!

BLOG EXCHANGE

New on ABI’s Bankruptcy Blog Exchange: Fair-Lending Laws Haven’t Caught Up to AI

Government officials must address the policy questions raised by the use of artificial intelligence in credit decisions, according to a recent blog post.

To read more on this blog and all others on the ABI Blog Exchange, please click here.

 
© 2019 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314

To UNSUBSCRIBE from future bankruptcy brief emails,
click here.

 

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Debt-Collection Dispute; Justices Raise Points Found in ABI Consumer Commission Report

ABI Bankruptcy Brief

April 25, 2019

 
%%first_name%% %%last_name%%
Update profile
%%dynamic_content_227%%
ABI Bankruptcy Brief
 
 
 
NEWS AND ANALYSIS

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Debt-Collection Dispute; Justices Raise Points Found in ABI Consumer Commission Report

The nation’s highest court will decide soon whether debt collectors should have more leeway to fight steep fines for pursuing collections even after a consumer used bankruptcy to make that debt disappear, the Wall Street Journal reported. Consumer advocates worry that the case could weaken protections for Americans who file for bankruptcy. U.S. Supreme Court justices yesterday heard oral argument in Taggart v. Lorenzen from lawyers who laid out a patchwork of rulings from judges who disagree on how easy it should be to punish debt collectors who pursue debt even after a person is no longer obligated to pay. Justice Elena Kagan said that she “was totally stunned” that it isn’t clear what standard applies. Roughly 750,000 people got out of bankruptcy with a discharge during the 12-month period ending Sept. 30, 2018, according to ABI researcher Ed Flynn, who analyzed Federal Judicial Center figures. At yesterday's arguments, several justices were concerned about who is responsible for proving that collectors knew about a bankruptcy filing and who would pay for legal disputes over violations. “Since allowing the creditors to proceed on debts that may or may not be dischargeable, it seems to me perfectly reasonable to have them bear the risk [and] have them make a careful choice,” Chief Justice John Roberts said. Several consumer-advocacy nonprofits, law professors and retired bankruptcy judges Gene Wedoff and Leif Clark raised similar questions in legal briefs filed before the arguments began. Lifting the onus from debt collectors and other creditors could encourage aggressive creditors to risk trying to collect a discharged debt, knowing that the bankrupt person needs to prove that a violation occurred, they said. People who have gone through bankruptcy could be too poor to fight in court, and their lawyers have no duty to represent them in such disputes, these people said. (Subscription required.)



A recommendation in the Final Report of ABI's Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy on discharge injunction enforcement dovetailed with the oral argument comments by Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kagan, according to Commissioner Rudy Cerone of McGlinchey Stafford (New Orleans). With respect to Kagan’s analogy to § 362(k), the Commission recommended, at section 1.02(a), that § 524 be amended to provide the same private right of action as is available under 362. Concerning the “safe harbor” cited by the Chief Justice, section 1.02(b) of the Commission Report recommends the adoption of an expedited contested matter procedure under the Bankruptcy Rules to obtain a bankruptcy court order on whether the discharge injunction applies to a particular action. To download a copy of the Commission's Final Report, please click here.

Commentary: Two Bills Being Considered by Congress Can Help Family Businesses in Financial Distress

Our bankruptcy laws may be well provisioned for (1) large businesses with lots of passive owners and (2) consumers, but our bankruptcy laws fall short for struggling family businesses and their owners, according to a blog post by Don Swanson. Two bills currently winding their way through the U.S. Senate are attempts to correct, but they still need a little tweaking, according to Swanson. On the surface, the Small Business Reorganization Act (SBRA) provides much-needed relief for small businesses. Here’s the catch, according to Swanson: To qualify as a small business under the Act, the debtor must have less than $2.6 million of debt. Most successful businesses have more debt than that, according to Swanson. The SBRA is a great piece of legislation that needs to be enacted at once. But its $2.6 million debt limit needs to go away, according to Swanson. Second, the Family Farm Relief Act would expand the debt-eligibility limits for family farmers seeking chapter 12 from $4.4 million to $10 million. The $10 million limit being proposed in the bill is helpful, but Swanson poses the question of why there should be a debt limit at all for family farmers. While he recommends a few tweaks to be made to both bills, Swanson finds the two pieces of legislation to be good vehicles for helping struggling small business owners and family farmers access bankruptcy.



To access the full bill text of the Small Business Reorganization Act (S. 1091) and the Family Farm Relief Act (S. 897), be sure to visit the Legislative News page in the ABI Newsroom.

Sen. Warren’s Student-Debt Deal Would Most Benefit Stronger Earners, Study Finds

A new analysis by the Brookings Institution found that Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s (D) proposal for the government to forgive a huge chunk of student debt would disproportionately help upper-income households, the Wall Street Journal reported. Nearly half of the estimated $640 billion to be forgiven under her plan would go to the top 40 percent of earners, or households making at least $67,847 a year, according to the Brookings Institution, a think tank. The analysis also shows a disproportionate share of the money would go to those in managerial and professional jobs. A quarter of the money would go to people with master’s degrees, and 9 percent would go to households with doctorate and professional degrees, such as lawyers and doctors. About 28 percent of the money would go to households in the bottom 40 percent of earners. A tenth would go to households in the bottom fifth. Lower-income households tend to have less student debt — but are also more likely to default on their loans — because they include higher rates of borrowers who dropped out or attended low-quality schools and have fewer resources to repay.

Study: Gen Z Getting to the Mall More than Previous Generations

An International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) study found that nearly 95 percent of those in Generation Z visited a physical shopping center in a three-month period in 2018, as opposed to just 75 percent of millennials and 58 percent of Gen Xers, Bloomberg Businessweek reported. And they genuinely like it; three-quarters of them said that going to a brick-and-mortar store was a better experience than online, ICSC found. “There’s always been this assumption that as you go through the age spectrum, the younger consumer that has grown up with online and digital and is very savvy would shun physical experiences,” said Neil Saunders, an analyst at GlobalData Retail. “But actually that’s not turned out to be the case.” Gen Z — or the group of kids, teens and young adults roughly between the ages of 7 and 22 — still appreciate brick and mortar. But they aren’t just millennials living in a different time. Today’s teens interact differently with stores than their older siblings and Gen X parents before them, and several retailers who didn’t understand the fundamental differences in how they shop have landed themselves in bankruptcy court: Charlotte Russe, Wet Seal and Claire’s were once staples of the teen mall circuit.

Fed Shift Shakes Up World of Speculative Debt

A sharp rally in speculative-grade corporate bonds has pushed the average yield on those bonds below that of comparably rated loans, an unusual market distortion reflecting an improved U.S. economic outlook and the Federal Reserve’s retreat from tightening monetary policy, the Wall Street Journal reported. Bond yields, which move in the opposite direction of prices, typically exceed those of loans because holders of the latter are typically paid first in bankruptcies. This year, yields on both are down amid a broad rally in riskier assets. As of Tuesday, the average yield to maturity of bonds in the Bloomberg Barclays high yield index was 6.51 percent, down from 8 percent at the end of last year, while the average yield of loans in the S&P/LSTA Leveraged Loan index was 6.53 percent, down from 7.23 percent. Loan yields have exceeded bond yields since March 26, the first prolonged stretch where that has been the case since 2007. That year, the Fed also shifted course after years of raising rates.

Commentary: After the Bust, Are Bitcoins More Like Tulip Mania or the Internet?

When you talk to tech industry insiders about where Bitcoin is heading, two vastly different comparisons are inevitable: the tulip bulb and the internet, according to a New York Times commentary. Bitcoin’s critics say that the digital tokens are like the tulip bulbs of 17th-century Holland. They generated a wild, speculative rush that quickly disappeared, leaving behind nothing but pretty flowers and wrecked bank accounts. Bitcoin believers, on the other hand, want us to think about cryptocurrencies as if they were the internet: a broad technology category that took some time to reach its potential, even though expectations got ahead of reality in the early years. If that’s true, last year’s crash in Bitcoin prices was like the dot-com bust — a temporary setback before the big ideas come to fruition. The commentary does not find that either of these comparisons of Bitcoin quite works, however. Bitcoin is neither an irredeemable flop nor an economic miracle. We are still a few years away from any sort of clarity about where this technology will fit in the world. If we want to imagine where it might be going, we need to look beneath the gyrating price to understand how it is being used today and who is using it. At the most basic level, Bitcoin has introduced a new way to hold and send around value online. Anyone can open a Bitcoin wallet and receive money from a friend or a stranger. The system works without any central authority, thanks to a network of computers that is not unlike the network of computers supporting the internet. Even after last year’s bust, Bitcoin users are generally sending somewhere between $400 million and $800 million worth of Bitcoin across the network every day, according to data from the blockchain, the public ledger on which all Bitcoin transactions are recorded.

Sign up Today to Receive Rochelle’s Daily Wire by E-mail!
Have you signed up for Rochelle’s Daily Wire in the ABI Newsroom? Receive Bill Rochelle’s exclusive perspectives and analyses of important case decisions via e-mail!

Tap into Rochelle’s Daily Wire via the ABI Newsroom and Twitter!

BLOG EXCHANGE

New on ABI’s Bankruptcy Blog Exchange: Wisconsin Credit Unions, Banks Get Legal Win in Collections Case

The Wisconsin Supreme Court upheld a "narrow interpretation" of a state-level consumer-protection law that maintains lenders' rights to collect debts without fear of being sued for damages, according to a recent blog post.

To read more on this blog and all others on the ABI Blog Exchange, please click here.

 
© 2019 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314

To UNSUBSCRIBE from future bankruptcy brief emails,
click here.

 

The Student-Debt Crisis Hitting Hardest at Historically Black Colleges

ABI Bankruptcy Brief

April 18, 2019

 
ABI Bankruptcy Brief
 
 
 
NEWS AND ANALYSIS

The Student-Debt Crisis Hitting Hardest at Historically Black Colleges

Historically black colleges and universities helped lift generations of African-Americans to economic security. Now, attendance has become a financial drag on many of their young graduates, members of a new generation hit particularly hard by the student-debt crisis, the Wall Street Journal reported today. Students of these institutions, known as HBCUs, are leaving with disproportionately high loans compared with their peers at other schools, a Wall Street Journal analysis of Education Department data found, and are less likely to repay those loans than they were a decade ago. Among key findings of the Journal’s examination of 2017 data, the latest available:

• HBCU alumni have a median federal-debt load of about $29,000 at graduation — 32 percent above graduates of other public and nonprofit four-year schools.

• The majority of HBCU grads haven’t paid down even $1 of their original loan balance in the first few years out of school.

• America’s 82 four-year HBCUs make up 5 percent of four-year institutions, but more than 50 percent of the 100 schools with the lowest three-year student loan repayment rates.

Though HBCUs typically cost less than other public and nonprofit four-year schools, these colleges have long trailed those peers on measures of debt and repayment. Now they are trailing by far greater margins. Many HBCUs see a mandate in giving opportunity to disadvantaged youth, who often start out with fewer financial resources and a diminished ability to pay. Read more. (Subscription required.)

ABI’s Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy recently released its Final Report of recommendations to improve the consumer bankruptcy system, and student loan debt was one of the issues addressed in the report. To obtain a copy of the report and to watch the special briefing by Commission leadership to discuss the Final Report, please click here.

Sears Sues Lampert, Claiming He Looted Company and Drove It into Bankruptcy

Sears Holdings Corp. sued longtime Chairman Eddie Lampert, his hedge fund ESL Investments, and former directors including Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, accusing them of allowing the retailer to be looted of billions of dollars before its October 2018 bankruptcy filing, Reuters reported today. The lawsuit, made public today, was filed by the restructuring team winding down what remains of the pre-bankruptcy Sears following Lampert’s $5.2 billion purchase in February of most of its assets. Sears accused Lampert of ordering the creation of bogus financial plans showing that the retailer would turn itself around even as it racked up huge losses, enabling the transfer of five major assets including Land’s End and Sears Hometown Outlet for his benefit.

Malls Under Pressure as More Stores Close

Strong retail numbers last year from department stores Macy’s Inc. and Nordstrom Inc. raised hopes that the beleaguered mall industry would finally rebound. But recent developments this year are pointing to more trouble ahead, the Wall Street Journal reported. A number of struggling retailers are closing stores and being more selective about where to open ones, dimming prospects for many mall owners and investors. U.S. retailers have already closed 5,994 stores so far this year, compared with 5,864 closures for all of last year, according to Coresight Research. The net store closings, or the number of closings minus openings this year, stands at 3,353. Payless ShoeSource Inc., Gymboree Group Inc. and Charlotte Russe Holding Inc. are among the retailers to announce plans to close stores after earlier attempts at restructuring failed. An unexpected rebound in brick-and-mortar stores last year suggested that malls might enjoy a bit of a comeback, too. Consumer spending was strong, and shopping centers benefited from the expansion of beauty chains like Sephora and Ulta. Macy’s and Nordstrom made new investments in their stores to create a more appealing experience for shoppers. But retail sales have slipped more recently, falling 0.2 percent in February from a month earlier after gaining 0.7 percent in January. Retail sales fell 1.2 percent in December. The mortgage for Destiny USA, one of the largest malls in the country, was recently moved to a special servicer that deals with defaults or renegotiations of loan terms. The servicer said that it expects the mall owner, Pyramid Management Group, to default when the mortgage is due in June. (Subscription required.)



Occupancy issues are at the heart of many significant retail cases, as detailed in the ABI publication Retail and Office Bankruptcy: Landlord/Tenant Rights, available at the ABI Store.

Commentary: Fed Should Buy Muni Bonds to Fight the Next Recession

U.S. state governments suffered major damage from the last recession 10 years ago. During the second quarter of 2009, the final months of the downturn, personal income taxes tumbled 27 percent from a year earlier. At the same time, expenses grew as enrollment for Medicaid and state unemployment insurance soared, while crumbling asset prices suddenly left public pension systems with massive shortfalls relative to their liabilities. Over the past decade, the slow-but-steady economic expansion has covered up these issues but hasn’t erased them, according to a Bloomberg commentary today. State government employment remains below its pre-financial crisis peak. Public pension plans are still largely in a sea of red ink, with an overall shortfall of $1.4 trillion at the state level, and even those with an acceptable level of assets are just one bear market away from the brink. And it’s no secret that the U.S. has fallen terribly behind in funding its roads, bridges, airports and public transit systems, according to the commentary. As the Federal Reserve contemplates what the next recession might look like, and what tools it has available to combat it, the fiscal health of U.S. states is likely to emerge as a significant roadblock to any economic recovery. The easy answer would be directing more cash from the federal government to the states, according to the commentary. But the 2009 stimulus program already transferred an unprecedented amount of money into state coffers, and the results were middling at best. In the current political climate, and with U.S. deficits already running close to $1 trillion, it’s anyone’s guess whether a similar package could come together. That means it might be up to the Fed to get involved in the $3.8 trillion municipal-bond market to give states a much-needed boost, according to the commentary. The central bank can only do so much during a downturn to get companies and individuals to borrow. But by directly backing states, it will immediately allow them to make payroll, start on new infrastructure projects, or both.

CTreasury Issues Rules on Tax Breaks for Opportunity Zones

The Trump administration released regulations yesterday that could help venture capitalists, Native American tribes and entrepreneurs benefit from a new tax incentive meant to encourage investment in struggling communities, the New York Times reported. Backers of that incentive, known as Opportunity Zones, had complained to the administration in recent weeks that its regulations could end up steering most of that money into real estate development rather than to start-up businesses that are more likely to create well-paying jobs. The rules released yesterday appeared to ease many of those fears. But critics said that the administration had not done enough to make sure that the program achieved its goals. Under the 169-page proposed regulation, the second in a series of rules meant to clarify the 2017 tax law that created the zones, investors can take advantage of the tax breaks in several ways. The new methods are particularly important for investors who hope to fund new coffee shops, grocery stores or possibly, as administration officials conceded yesterday, marijuana dispensaries in states that have legalized the drug.

Sign up Today to Receive Rochelle’s Daily Wire by E-mail!
Have you signed up for Rochelle’s Daily Wire in the ABI Newsroom? Receive Bill Rochelle’s exclusive perspectives and analyses of important case decisions via e-mail!

Tap into Rochelle’s Daily Wire via the ABI Newsroom and Twitter!

BLOG EXCHANGE

New on ABI’s Bankruptcy Blog Exchange: When It Comes to Bank Stress Tests, Less Is More

The Fed is stepping up transparency around its process for testing bank resiliency in a hypothetical crisis, but additional improvements are needed, according to a recent blog post.

To read more on this blog and all others on the ABI Blog Exchange, please click here.

 
© 2019 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314

To UNSUBSCRIBE from future bankruptcy brief emails,
click here.

 

Legal Experts Urge Federal Lawmakers to Fix Consumer Bankruptcy Law

ABI Bankruptcy Brief

April 11, 2019

 
ABI Bankruptcy Brief
 
 
 
NEWS AND ANALYSIS

Legal Experts Urge Federal Lawmakers to Fix Consumer Bankruptcy Law

Parts of the country’s consumer bankruptcy system are badly broken, according to a new report from ABI's Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy, which calls for better protections for homeowners, student loan borrowers and low-income families who can’t afford to file for chapter 7 protection, the Wall Street Journal reported. Bankruptcy courts — the federal court that everyday citizens are most likely to use — have lost their power to help people fix some financial problems stemming from the massive social and economic shifts that have taken place since modern bankruptcy law was passed in 1978, according to the report released today. The commission urged federal lawmakers to pass changes to bankruptcy law that it said would make it easier for financially struggling Americans to get a fresh start. The 218-page report blamed the law’s weakened power on skyrocketing student loan debt, changing finance trends for mortgages, unscrupulous lawyers, and federal lawmakers who passed new rules in 2005 as growing numbers of Americans declared bankruptcy. (Subscription required.)



To obtain a copy of the report, please click here.

To watch the special briefing this morning by Commission leadership to discuss the Final Report, please click here.

Sessions at the Annual Spring Meeting tomorrow and Saturday will feature members of the Commission taking a closer look at the Final Report. Walk-ups welcome!

Senate Legislation Introduced to Help Small Businesses Restructure Debt

Senate Judiciary Committee members Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Amy Klobuchar, Joni Ernst and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) on Tuesday introduced S. 1091, the "Small Business Reorganization Act" (SBRA), according to a press release from Sen. Grassley's office. The bill streamlines existing bankruptcy procedures and provides new tools to improve small businesses’ ability to restructure. Representatives Doug Collins (R-Ga.) and David Cicilline (D-R.I.) are working to introduce companion legislation in the House of Representatives. “Our bankruptcy system is designed to help highly complex businesses reorganize after falling on hard times, but for many small businesses going through bankruptcy, these requirements can create unnecessary burdens that stall recovery," Grassley said. "The Small Business Reorganization Act takes into account the unique needs of small businesses and streamlines existing reorganization processes. The legislation adds a new subchapter V to chapter 11 to streamline the bankruptcy process for small business debtors. By reducing liquidations and increasing recoveries to creditors, the bill will lead to more successful restructurings. Specifically, key provisions of the Small Business Reorganization Act will increase debtors’ ability to negotiate a successful reorganization and retain control of the business, reduce unnecessary procedural burdens and costs, and increases oversight and ensures quick reorganization. The SBRA was crafted in consultation with ABI, the National Bankruptcy Conference and the National Conference of Bankruptcy Judges, and it incorporates input from numerous stakeholders ranging from commercial lenders to U.S. Trustees.



Click here to read the full bill text.

Moody's Gives Thumbs Up to Detroit's ‘Conservative' Fiscal 2020 Budget

Moody's Investors Service is giving the Detroit City Council's newly minted 2020 fiscal year budget high marks for using "conservative revenue assumptions" and socking away $45 million in surplus revenue to fund post-bankruptcy pension obligations coming due in five years, Crain's Detroit Business reported. The Wall Street credit-rating agency said the $2.1 billion overall spending plan for the fiscal year that begins July 1 that City Council passed Monday is "credit positive" for Michigan's largest city — more than four years after it emerged from the largest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history. "The credit-positive budget reflects sound financial practices, including conservative revenue assumptions and long-range projections, [and] a significant capital investment and continues to set aside funds for a scheduled pension cost spike in fiscal 2024," Moody's analysts wrote in a note published today. The budget plan adds $45 million to a $123 million trust fund Mayor Mike Duggan's administration created to help the city shoulder its bankruptcy court-ordered resumption of full pension payments in the 2024 fiscal year.

Commentary: Why Privatizing Puerto Rico's Electrical System Will Fail

Current plans to privatize Puerto Rico's electrical system are likely to fail, according to a commentary in The Hill on Monday. Billions of dollars of investment are needed to restore and upgrade Puerto Rico’s electrical system, which continues to run mostly on oil-fired power plants. Further, the system relies heavily on an extensive network of long-distance transmission lines that are vulnerable to severe storms. The Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority’s (PREPA) fiscal plan, approved by the federal Financial Oversight and Management Board, calls for $7 billion over five years in federal investment as a “floor” on funding needed for resilience; other estimates put that floor significantly higher. Without adequate investment, the next major storm in Puerto Rico will cost yet more lives and further delay economic recovery. Congress should take note that the privatization plans currently under consideration are not likely to achieve the island’s declared policy of affordable, resilient and 100 percent renewable energy by 2050, according to the commentary.

Report: Shrinking Middle Class Threatens Global Growth, Stability

The middle class is shrinking and its economic power diminishing in the U.S. and other rich countries, a development that threatens political stability and economic growth, according to a report by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the Wall Street Journal reported. At the peak of its powers in 1985, the aggregate income of the middle classes was four times that of the richest group. Three decades later, it had fallen to less than three times. And while income growth for the middle classes has been slow over that period, the cost of housing, education and health care has risen much more rapidly. The result of that squeeze is that middle-income households have taken on more debt and feel less secure in their status, while younger generations are less likely to gain membership in a group once seen as accessible to all. The notion that the middle class is under pressure isn’t entirely new, and has become more politically salient since the financial crisis. But the OECD’s report provides evidence to back up that sense of peril. (Subscription required.)

Commentary: What’s at Risk if the Fed Becomes as Partisan as the Rest of Washington, D.C.

Politicians have had strong opinions on what the Federal Reserve should and shouldn’t do throughout its 105-year history, according to a New York Times commentary. They have pushed for lower interest rates and easier money, or for this or that policy on bank regulation or consumer protection. They have summoned Fed leaders to the White House or Congress to persuade and cajole. In that sense, there is nothing new in President Trump’s aggressive approach to the Fed, according to the commentary. This week, he called for lower interest rates and new quantitative easing, and he signaled an intention to appoint two vocal supporters, Stephen Moore and Herman Cain, to the board of governors. What makes Trump’s approach to the Fed so unusual is that he has repeatedly publicly undermined a Fed chief he appointed (Jerome Powell), and, if successful, he would put two officials with a background in partisan politics in the inner sanctum of Fed policymaking. (Moore was founder of the Club for Growth, which supports conservative candidates for office, and Cain ran for president.) “People around the table did have political views, and I did, too,” said Alan Blinder, who was appointed vice chairman of the Fed by President Bill Clinton and is more recently the author of “Advice and Dissent,” about the role of politicians versus technocrats in shaping policy. “But you weren’t supposed to bring them into the room when it was time to make a decision, and people didn’t.”

Sign up Today to Receive Rochelle’s Daily Wire by E-mail!
Have you signed up for Rochelle’s Daily Wire in the ABI Newsroom? Receive Bill Rochelle’s exclusive perspectives and analyses of important case decisions via e-mail!

Tap into Rochelle’s Daily Wire via the ABI Newsroom and Twitter!

BLOG EXCHANGE

New on ABI’s Bankruptcy Blog Exchange: Getting Pot Banking Legislation Right

The House Financial Services Committee recently approved protections for banks financing cannabis companies in states where it’s legal. This a good first step, but improvements are needed, according to a recent blog post.

To read more on this blog and all others on the ABI Blog Exchange, please click here.

 
© 2019 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314

To UNSUBSCRIBE from future bankruptcy brief emails,
click here.

 

Report: Young Americans Faring Less Well in Credit Markets

ABI Bankruptcy Brief

April 4, 2019

 
ABI Bankruptcy Brief
 
 
 
NEWS AND ANALYSIS

Report: Young Americans Faring Less Well in Credit Markets

Young Americans are getting left behind when it comes to credit access, the New York Federal Reserve said in a report released on Tuesday, the Wall Street Journal reported. The central bank’s finding came in a report that detailed the growth of credit access and borrowing levels. The New York Fed said that while overall debt levels have surpassed their prior peak, overall borrowing quality has improved and become more sustainable. “Trends since 2008 have focused debt growth among older, higher credit score, and presumably wealthier, households,” the report said. That is leaving the younger generation behind. “Burdened by increasing amounts of student debt, reduced homeownership and home equity, and relatively high or increasing student and auto loan delinquency rates, their financial situation contrasts sharply with the overall generally improved dynamics in household debt,” the New York Fed report said.



To view the full report, please click here.

Analysis: Risky Company Debt Is Getting Riskier

Protections built into loans and bonds are being steadily eroded, but investors keep buying, according to a Bloomberg News analysis. Private-equity firms such as Apollo Global Management and KKR & Co. have fought to make it easier for the companies they own to take on more debt soon after borrowing, and for debtors to sell off assets and pay the proceeds to shareholders. For a decade they had already chipped away at other provisions in loans known as “maintenance covenants” — requirements that a corporate borrower meet specific performance hurdles or else be forced to renegotiate terms or even repay debt. Private-equity firms “began to select their investment banks based in part on who could get the loosest high-yield covenants,” says Kirk Davenport, a former partner at law firm Latham & Watkins who also worked for Drexel on early junk-bond deals. “And once they figured that out, the race to the bottom was on.” Moody’s Investors Service says covenants for bonds and loans generally are at or near their weakest levels since the ratings firm started tracking them nearly a decade ago. When the economy slows, lenders could suffer much bigger losses than in previous downturns, say strategists at UBS Group AG, who estimate that lenders might recover less than half their money instead of 75 percent to 80 percent because of eroded protections.

ABI Consumer Bankruptcy Commission Report Coming Next Thursday

ABI's Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy next Thursday unveils its Final Report of recommendations to make consumer bankruptcy more accessible for financially struggling Americans. The report will be made available on April 11 at 9 a.m. EDT at consumercommission.abi.org, and you can tap in online to a special briefing at 10 a.m. EDT by Commission leadership. Also, be sure to attend the Annual Spring Meeting next week for sessions providing an in-depth look at the recommendations. Register here.

U.S. Regulators Propose Rule Discouraging Large Banks from Investing in Competitors' Debt

U.S. bank regulators proposed a rule on Tuesday that would discourage large banks from heavily investing in debt issued by other large banks by requiring them to hold additional capital against such investments. The proposal from the Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency is aimed at ensuring that banks do not end up holding large amounts of “total loss-absorbing capacity” (TLAC) debt from fellow banks. Banks are required to issue TLAC debt under new rules established after the 2008 financial crisis, which were aimed at ensuring banks can quickly access more equity if pushed to bankruptcy. Banks are required to issue TLAC debt under new rules established after the 2008 financial crisis, which were aimed at ensuring that banks can quickly access more equity if pushed to bankruptcy, lowering the odds that taxpayers would need to bail them out. However, if large banks like JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs and Citigroup simply bought up each other’s debt, regulators worry it could weaken that safeguard should a broad future crisis hit multiple global banks at once. Specifically, the rule would actively discourage larger banks from investing in TLAC debt by requiring banks to put up additional capital against large amounts of such investments. The proposal would also require those banks to publicly report how much of that debt they have outstanding.

Commentary: Corporate Executives Must Face Jail Time for Overseeing Massive Scams

It is time to reform our laws to make sure that corporate executives face jail time for overseeing massive scams, according to a commentary by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) in the Washington Post on Tuesday. When a criminal on the street steals money from your wallet, they go to jail. When small-business owners cheat their customers, they go to jail. But when corporate executives at big companies oversee huge frauds that hurt tens of thousands of people, they often get to walk away under the current system with multimillion-dollar payouts, according to Warren. Too often, prosecutors don’t even try to hold top executives criminally accountable. Warren calls on Congress to enact the "Ending Too Big To Jail Act," which she introduced last year. That bill would make it easier to hold executives at big banks accountable for scams by requiring them to certify that they conducted a “due diligence” inquiry and found that no illegal conduct was occurring on their watch. Warren said that she also introduced a bill that expands criminal liability to any corporate executive who negligently oversees a giant company causing severe harm to U.S. families.

Big Banks Reach for Small Deals as Merger Boom Slows

Investment bankers across Wall Street are tripping over themselves, and sometimes each other, to win business advising smaller companies on deals — assignments they would have scoffed at a few years ago, the Wall Street Journal reported. They are hiring bankers in cities like Dallas and Atlanta and cozying up to a different set of corporate executives. As the post-crisis deal boom shows signs of slowing, Wall Street firms accustomed to headline-grabbing megadeals are sliding downmarket. Deals between $500 million and a few billion dollars historically have been dominated by regional firms such as Harris Williams & Co. in Richmond, Va., and Minneapolis’s Piper Jaffray Cos. “Every 10 years or so, the big banks get the idea to move in,” said Mark Brady, head of mergers and acquisitions at William Blair & Co., a Chicago-based firm where the average deal is $400 million. “As soon as there’s a down cycle, they disappear.” Bank executives say they are committed this time. Their own investors are demanding growth, and “there are only so many big transactions,” Mr. Brady said. There were 135 deals in the U.S. last year valued at over $2 billion, versus 2,200 under, according to FactSet.

Don't Miss Annual Spring Meeting Next Week in Washington, D.C.!

ABI's Annual Spring Meeting starts next week, featuring 30 sessions with expert speakers analyzing important bankruptcy cases and issues. Legendary journalist and author Bob Woodward will deliver a keynote to provide the pulse of D.C. Additionally, ABI's Consumer Bankruptcy Commission will release its final report of recommendations to improve the consumer bankruptcy system. Don't miss the engaging sessions. Don't miss the ample networking opportunities. Don't miss THE bankruptcy event of the year. Register here.

Sign up Today to Receive Rochelle’s Daily Wire by E-mail!
Have you signed up for Rochelle’s Daily Wire in the ABI Newsroom? Receive Bill Rochelle’s exclusive perspectives and analyses of important case decisions via e-mail!

Tap into Rochelle’s Daily Wire via the ABI Newsroom and Twitter!

BLOG EXCHANGE

New on ABI’s Bankruptcy Blog Exchange: Wells Fargo Offers New Student Card Benefits After Backlash

Wells Fargo said holders of its student cards will see their costs decline by about half as it expands benefits after drawing scrutiny earlier this year for high fees on college campuses, according to a recent blog post.

To read more on this blog and all others on the ABI Blog Exchange, please click here.

 
© 2019 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314

To UNSUBSCRIBE from future bankruptcy brief emails,
click here.

 

Pages