With deadlines already elapsed, Judge Grossman disagrees with three judges who allowed redesignation under subchapter V of chapter 11.
Courts still have no consensus about debtors’ right to receive PPP ‘loans’ under the Cares Act.
Florida judge largely agrees with a Delaware judge by holding that the increase in fees for the U.S. Trustee program is neither impermissibly retroactive nor unconstitutional, mostly speaking.
In matrimonial cases, courts find creative reasons for not avoiding a lien that impairs an exemption.
A subsequent transferee may be entitled to challenge a fraudulent transfer judgment from a prior suit against the initial transferee.
Florida case raises the question of whether the Supreme Court will eventually give bankruptcy a general exemption from arbitration, or an exemption only for core proceedings.
A chapter 13 plan that improperly modifies a home mortgage remains binding unless the lender has objected to confirmation.
Former NFL players with neurological impairment can file bankruptcy and exempt payments under league’s concussion settlement.
Lease-approval order held moot under Section 363(m) for lack of a stay pending appeal.
Florida judge finds no duty to investigate suspicions of fraud when even the auditors had been duped.